Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Dawn Flood <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:16:59 -0500
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/24/2026 5:51 AM, Andrew wrote:
> "Attila" wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>  "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III stated, 
>>>>>> namely, that "intelligent design is not a legitimate scientific 
>>>>>> theory".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model".
>>>>> And it is the~only one~that accords ->with the evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
>>>>> model, would be to reject all of the evidence
>>>>> that tells us it is.
>>>>> One is free to do so.but then they identify
>>>>> themselves to be a fool.
>>>>
>>>> Proponent Claims: Supporters argue that design detection
>>>> relies on empirical data and standard methods of historical
>>>> science to recognize intelligent agency.
>>>>
>>>> Scientific Consensus: The mainstream scientific community
>>>> rejects ID as a scientific model, categorizing it instead as
>>>> a form of creationism because it invokes unobservable,
>>>> supernatural causes that cannot be tested or falsified
>>>> through experimentation.
>>>>
>>>> Legal and Educational Context: Courts (such as the 2005
>>>> Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling) have determined that ID is
>>>> religious in nature
>>>
>>> Yet every living thing came from an egg or seed that had ,__in 
>>> digital code format__  ithe nstructions for the synthesis of that 
>>> very thing.
>>>
>>> So you actually believe that instructions written in a
>>> digital code could originate without the involvement
>>> of an intelligent mind.
>>
>> Yes.
> 
> Then you have a religious belief that rejects
> anything that could possibly expose it to be
> merely an unscientific and foolish *fantasy*.
> 

And, we have been through this before, Andrew.  DNA/RNA are molecules, 
and molecules are composed of atoms, atoms are composed of protons, 
neutrons and electrons; electrons appear to be fundamental and not 
composed of anything and protons & neutrons are composed of quarks, 
which also appear to be fundamental.

It is the ability of DNA (especially) and RNA (likely, at the beginning 
of life) to make copies of themselves with the help of other molecules 
(proteins & enzymes) that is the basis of chemical & biological evolution.

One must wonder why a Creator would take well over two billion years to 
go from the first prokaryotic cells to the first eukaryotic cells. 
Maybe such makes sense to you, but such does not make sense to me.

On a related note, some people think that humans will colonize Mars some 
day, but the Great Oxidation Event that led to our oxygen atmosphere 
(which, of course, we need to breath) occurred over the span of 250 
million years.  And, so, where these people who live on Mars someday are 
going to get all of their air is a mystery to me!

Dawn