Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

On Sat, 25 Jul 2026 04:07:03 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Andrew" wrote:
>>>"Attila" wrote:   
>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>"Attila" wrote:   
>>>>>>  "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III stated, 
>>>>>>>> namely, that "intelligent design is not a legitimate scientific theory".
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model". 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it is the~only one~that accords ->with 
>>>>>>>the evidence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
>>>>>>>model, would be to reject all of the evidence
>>>>>>>that tells us it is. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>One is free to do so.but then they identify
>>>>>>>themselves to be a fool.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Proponent Claims: Supporters argue that design detection
>>>>>> relies on empirical data and standard methods of historical
>>>>>> science to recognize intelligent agency.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Scientific Consensus: The mainstream scientific community
>>>>>> rejects ID as a scientific model, categorizing it instead as
>>>>>> a form of creationism because it invokes unobservable,
>>>>>> supernatural causes that cannot be tested or falsified
>>>>>> through experimentation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Legal and Educational Context: Courts (such as the 2005
>>>>>> Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling) have determined that ID is
>>>>>> religious in nature
>>>>>
>>>>>Yet every living thing came from an egg or seed that 
>>>>>had ,__in digital code format__  ithe nstructions for 
>>>>>the synthesis of that very thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you actually believe that instructions written in a
>>>>>digital code could originate without the involvement
>>>>>of an intelligent mind.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>Then you have a religious belief that rejects
>>>anything that could possibly expose it to be
>>>merely an unscientific and foolish *fantasy*.
>>>
>> 
>> Sigh.  I have no religious beliefs no matter what you say.
>
>Yet you believe a complex technical library could be written 
>using a "quaternary digital code format" all by itself, with no 
>outside intelligent input.

Yes.

>
>You just acknowledged that! See above. This is your faith.
>Contrary to all common sense. as well as to all real world 
>science This is your non-theistic false religion. 

As I have stated the conditions under which life can exist
were set at the beginning of the universe (if it had a
beginning).  The conditions on earth plus the operation of
evolution spending millions of years trying various
varieties of life could result in life on Earth as we know
it today.

There is no evidence to indicate the influence of any
outside force other than "there must be something".

I will wait for the actual evidence.  No faith is involved
other than in a natural evolutionary process.

>
>> I have seen nothing that supports the existence of any god
>
>No one claims otherwise about you. 

Yet you keep answering me with references to your
superstition.

>
>> and I have no reason to think I am not correct.
>
>Except you adamantly adhere to..your false, non-theistic
>religion,..contrary to real world science, and contrary to
>truth.

I have no religion and I challenge your "real world science"
and especially your "truth".

>
>> The physical conditions of the universe were set when it
>> came into being 
>
>You mean, when it was Created? 

I mean what I said.  I see no evidence of creation other
than existence.

>
>> if it did not always exist. 
>
>Scientists know that it did not 'always' exist..

The jury is still out.  When the explosion that spread the
current pattern of matter is known but nothing about before
that occurred.

>
>> If life was to exist it must do so under the existing conditions.  
>
>Of course.
>
>> Since evolution requires life to try every conceivable situation
>
>Yes, according to your religion.

You are unable to understand anything that doesn't fit your
"religion" pattern.

>
>> in order to continue there is no reason to think life as we
>> know it is not simply the current version of what works.
>
>You are a "molecules to man" believer. It is your religion

There you go again.

>
>> There may well be something else in the distant future.
>
>You may soon find out, because you are way 
>beyond the life expendence of a man your age.

Actually everyone my age is still alive.

>
>> The origional origin of life or the universe are other
>> issues not addressed here.
>
>Has been discussed many times here on alt.atheism.

Not by me.

>
>But you don't like to talk about those things since it
>exposes you to be deceived. And that you adhere to
>a non-theistic false religion.
>

No, it is simply another topic and I have no opinion on the
subject.

-- 


Every person in the US is here either  
legally or illegally. Those that are 
here illegally should be afraid.  
Be very afraid.  It does not matter 
how long you have been here.  It does 
not matter why you are here. It does not 
matter what you have done legally while you 
were here. It does not matter what any 
relative may have done while you were here. 
It only matters that you are here illegally. 
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer 
but we will find you and we will deport you. 
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process:
Q. Are you here legally?  If so, where is 
the documentation to establish that?

I support ending birthright citizenship

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting 
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

AA 966