Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Andrew wrote:
>> "Attila" wrote:  
>>> Andrew" wrote:
>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III 
>>>>>>>>> stated, namely, that "intelligent design is not a legitimate 
>>>>>>>>> scientific theory".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model".
>>>>>>>> And it is the~only one~that accords ->with the evidence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
>>>>>>>> model, would be to reject all of the evidence
>>>>>>>> that tells us it is.
>>>>>>>> One is free to do so.but then they identify
>>>>>>>> themselves to be a fool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Proponent Claims: Supporters argue that design detection
>>>>>>> relies on empirical data and standard methods of historical
>>>>>>> science to recognize intelligent agency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scientific Consensus: The mainstream scientific community
>>>>>>> rejects ID as a scientific model, categorizing it instead as
>>>>>>> a form of creationism because it invokes unobservable,
>>>>>>> supernatural causes that cannot be tested or falsified
>>>>>>> through experimentation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Legal and Educational Context: Courts (such as the 2005
>>>>>>> Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling) have determined that ID is
>>>>>>> religious in nature
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet every living thing came from an egg or seed that had ,__in 
>>>>>> digital code format__ ithe nstructions for the synthesis of that 
>>>>>> very thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you actually believe that instructions written in a
>>>>>> digital code could originate without the involvement
>>>>>> of an intelligent mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> Then you have a religious belief that rejects
>>>> anything that could possibly expose it to be
>>>> merely an unscientific and foolish *fantasy*.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sigh. I have no religious beliefs no matter what you say.
>> 
>> Yet you believe a complex technical library could be written using a 
>> "quaternary digital code format" all by itself, with no outside 
>> intelligent input.
>> 
>> You just acknowledged that! See above. This is your faith.
>> Contrary to all common sense. as well as to all real world science This 
>> is your non-theistic false religion.
>>> I have seen nothing that supports the existence of any god
>> 
>> No one claims otherwise about you.
>>> and I have no reason to think I am not correct.
>> 
>> Except you adamantly adhere to..your false, non-theistic
>> religion,..contrary to real world science, and contrary to
>> truth.
>> 
>>> The physical conditions of the universe were set when it
>>> came into being 
>> 
>> You mean, when it was Created?
>>> if it did not always exist. 
>> 
>> Scientists know that it did not 'always' exist..
>> 
>>> If life was to exist it must do so under the existing conditions. 
>> 
>> Of course.
>> 
>>> Since evolution requires life to try every conceivable situation
>> 
>> Yes, according to your religion.
>> 
>>> in order to continue there is no reason to think life as we
>>> know it is not simply the current version of what works.
>> 
>> You are a "molecules to man" believer. It is your religion
>> 
>>> There may well be something else in the distant future.
>> 
>> You may soon find out, because you are way beyond the 
>> life expendence of a man your age.
>> 
>>> The origional origin of life or the universe are other
>>> issues not addressed here.
>> 
>> Has been discussed many times here on alt.atheism.
>> 
>> But you don't like to talk about those things since it
>> exposes you to be deceived. And that you adhere to
>> a non-theistic false religion.
>> 
> 
> Hey Andrew!
> 
> On this one, I do NOT agree with you!!
> 
> Dawn

You obviously concur with the non-theistic
false ~religion~ of "Attila" contrary to "real 
world science", common sense and the truth..