Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
"Andrew" <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 03:29:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]... > "Andrew" wrote: >>"Dawn Flood" wrote: >>> Andrew wrote: >>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote: <> >>>> >>>>> If an experiment can be devised and replicated by any lab at will that >>>>> reflects what is found in the natural world, then such may be a good >>>>> model that can lead to further testable, hence falsifiable, predictions. >>>> >>>> Please see above.>>> >>> Even if such is beyond science does not at all prove that the "God did >>> It" explanation is the correct one. >> >> The point is that, there definitely has been the >> involvement of some super higher intelligence. Since we know that the detailed instructions in DNA that are written in a-->quaternary digital "code"<--could -not- have arisen without the input of some ultra, super, high intelligence, then> it seems that one who is intellectually honest would want to inquire ~who did this?. > That is not science. It's not even intellectualism! It's a > pseudo-explanation for what we see in the biological > world. Since what I wrote above is acknowledged to be true, then explain what you mean by saying that it, "is not science". Also please tell us what is a "non-pseudo-explanation" for what we see in the biological world; without using any unscientific fantasy in your respense. Thank you.