Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Andrew" <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 03:29:02 -0700
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization usenet-news.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew" wrote:
>>"Dawn Flood" wrote:     
>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:    
<>
>>>> 
>>>>> If an experiment can be devised and replicated by any lab at will that 
>>>>> reflects what is found in the natural world, then such may be a good 
>>>>> model that can lead to further testable, hence falsifiable, predictions.
>>>> 
>>>> Please see above.>>> 
>>> Even if such is beyond science does not at all prove that the "God did 
>>> It" explanation is the correct one.
>>
>>  The point is that, there definitely has been the
>>  involvement of some super higher intelligence.

Since we know that the detailed instructions in DNA that 
are written in a-->quaternary digital "code"<--could -not- 
have arisen without the input of some ultra, super, high 
intelligence, then> it seems that one who is intellectually 
honest would want to inquire ~who did this?.

> That is not science. It's not even intellectualism! It's a
> pseudo-explanation for what we see in the biological
> world.  

Since what I wrote above is acknowledged to be true,
then explain what you mean by saying that it, "is not 
science".

Also please tell us what is a "non-pseudo-explanation" 
for what we see in the biological world; without using 
any unscientific fantasy in your respense.

Thank you.