Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:02:26 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote:    
>>>>  "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote:   
>>>>><> 
>>>>>> Why does it have to be some "ultra, super, high 
>>>>>> intelligence?" Why not  just "intelligence"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>>Good question, Dawn! 
>>>>>
>>>>>We know it is far more advanced than us
>>>>>humans.
>>>>> 
>>>>>"DNA is like a computer program but far, 
>>>>>far more advanced than any software ever   
>>>>>created."          ~ Bill Gates
>>>>>
>>>>>Living things (that includes you and me) 
>>>>>would not exist without CODE  [DNA].
>>>> 
>>>> Although it uses the genetic code, DNA 
>>>> is not the same thing as it.
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>
>>>DNA is a molecule created for the purpose of
>>>carrying information. This information is in 
>>>the format of a quaternary digital code.
>> 
>> it; DNA uses four
>> nucleotides  (A,T,G, and C), so it's "quaternary," and "digital"
>> because the nucleotides are discrete rather than run together.
>> Certainly there's nothing that would require a super-calculating
>> super-intellect to create it. 
>
>Which is like saying,

We're talking about the genetic code right now, of course.  That
means, not the genome and not the rest of the DNA machinery.  

> "There's nothing fantastically complex 
>about"  the ~alphabet~ we use. 

Right. There isn't.  

>But by using this simple alphabet we can write a vast amount 
>of  books to fill libraries. 

Yeah, evolution is what fills those libraries of the biological world
using the genetic code.  Proteins are in that sense "discovered" by
the genetic code -- the same way words are "discovered" by the
alphabet.

>The books that were written using this alphabet, were written
>by sentient beings who used their_*intelligence*_ to do so.

Natural selection can lead to functionality in living things as well
as or better than "intelligence" per se. 

>Hope this helps.

I don't need any help from you.  I guess it's the thought that counts,
though, right?