Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
"Andrew" <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 03:56:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]... > "Andrew" wrote: >>"Vincent Maycock" wrote: >>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote: >>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>>>><> >>>>>>> Why does it have to be some "ultra, super, high >>>>>>> intelligence?" Why not just "intelligence"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dawn >>>>>> >>>>>>Good question, Dawn! >>>>>> >>>>>>We know it is far more advanced than us >>>>>>humans. >>>>>> >>>>>>"DNA is like a computer program but far, >>>>>>far more advanced than any software ever >>>>>>created." ~ Bill Gates >>>>>> >>>>>>Living things (that includes you and me) >>>>>>would not exist without CODE [DNA]. >>>>> >>>>> Although it uses the genetic code, DNA >>>>> is not the same thing as it. >>>> >>>>Yes. >>>> >>>>DNA is a molecule created for the purpose of >>>>carrying information. This information is in >>>>the format of a quaternary digital code. >>> >>> it; DNA uses four >>> nucleotides (A,T,G, and C), so it's "quaternary," and "digital" >>> because the nucleotides are discrete rather than run together. >>> Certainly there's nothing that would require a super-calculating >>> super-intellect to create it. >> >>Which is like saying, > > We're talking about the genetic code right now, of course. That > means, not the genome and not the rest of the DNA machinery. > >> "There's nothing fantastically complex >>about" the ~alphabet~ we use. > > Right. There isn't. > >>But by using this simple alphabet we can write a vast amount >>of books to fill libraries. > > Yeah, evolution is what fills those libraries of the biological > world Mendelian genetics shows how the biological world changes, within genetic limits. But does not tell us anything about the prime origin of the biological world.. Without this "prime origin" there would be no "evolution". Is this "prime origin" explained by evolution or natural selection? No that would not be possible, because natural selection can only select from that which _ALREADY_ exists.