Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Dawn Flood <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 18:58:26 -0500
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/1/2026 5:35 PM, Samuel Spade wrote:
> Dawn Flood wrote:
>> On 7/31/2026 4:03 PM, Andrew wrote:
>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>> <<<>>>
>>>>>>>> Why does it have to be some "ultra, super, high intelligence?" Why
>>>>>>>> not just "intelligence"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not random chance after quadrillions of attempts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, probably more than that! After all, if the Miller-Urey
>>>>>> experiment could get organic from inorganic after just a few hours,
>>>>>> what's another 500 million years??
>>>>>
>>>>> We have ALL of the "basic ingredients" that compose living things.
>>>>> Except for one critical thing.....
>>>>>
>>>>>                                 ~ Intelligence ~
>>>>>
>>>>> ---> Intelligence in the instructions to synthesizes living
>>>>> things.that exists in the DNA of all life.
>>>>>
>>>>> Evidence tells us that---> these instructions could only have
>>>>> originated from some super intelligent Agent.
>>>>>
>>>>>                                         ~ GOD ~
>>>>
>>>> Why not a super (duper) alien intelligence, those whose brains are
>>>> vastly superior to ours??
>>>
>>> But they had to be able to not only write the code
>>> itself, but to place it in the DNA molecule, which
>>> they also had to create..
>>>
>>> Somewhat of a super amazing accomplishment
>>> don't ya think?
>>>
>>> And what they did, is in your body, Dawn!
>>>
>>> Yes, every single cell!
>>>
>>> Otherwise you would not be.
>>>
>>> But you are.
>>>
>>> More evidence, Dawn!
>>>
>>
>> And, so, if a group of scientists would succeed in synthesizing a
>> self-replicating molecule from inorganic matter, are you then going to
>> claim that they were divinely, yet unknowingly, inspired??
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> Andrew would claim that, since the scientists are alive, it's
> life from existing life and therefore not abiogenesis.  Even
> though the ingredients are all inorganic.
> 
> That's how creationists claim there was never any
> abiogenesis... God was "alive", therefore life from life.
> Never mind that they can't show you any definition of "life"
> that covers gods, except by special pleading.

It's hard for me to imagine God getting a boner, but at least with 
respect to sexual reproduction:

no boner == no life.

(Okay, there are probably some exceptions to this generality!)

Dawn