Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Dawn Flood <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/2026 3:42 AM, Andrew wrote:
> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But
>>>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always
>>>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving
>>>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in
>>>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between
>>>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- 
>>>>>> replicating molecule
>>>>>>  would be artificially synthesized?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, 
>>>>> "naturally synthesized".
>>>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved 
>>>>> in its Creation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Dawn!
>>>>> Do you get the picture now?
>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because
>>>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already*
>>>>> exists.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), 
>>>> which is why it can happen so very quickly:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
>>>>
>>>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, 
>>>> to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly
>>>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog– 
>>>> wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most
>>>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog 
>>>> breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection
>>>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of 
>>>> phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers
>>>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs 
>>>> have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into
>>>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans.
>>>>
>>>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very 
>>>> quickly!
>>>
>>> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all
>>> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation
>>> (Gen 1:24-25).
>>>
>>> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs.
>>>
>>> That's all!
>>>
>>>> Now, why did it take God
>>>
>>> You finally concede He is.
>>>
>>>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn
>>>>  of Humanity? How about the "boring billion":
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion
>>>
>>> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy',
>>>
>>> Someone conjured it up in their imagination,
>>> and you fell for it.
>>>
>>>>  Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What
>>>>  was God doing during all of this time??!
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that?
>>
>> How old is the Earth, Andrew?  Universe?  You won't answer, will
>> you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam.
> ___________________________________________________
> 
> Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"!
> 
> Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the 
> truth!.
> 
> She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a
> 'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish  
> position.
> ____________________________________________________
> 
> What is a red herring logical fallacy?
> 
> A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to
> redirect a conversation away from its original topic.
> 
> In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a
> topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their
> position could make them look bad
> 
> (https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/)
> 

Andrew, Honey, it's just a simple question!  Just give a number for each!

He are mine:

Age of the Earth:  4.54 billion
Age of the Universe:  13.8 billion

See, that was easy!!

Dawn

P.S.  Now, if you ask me for my skirt size, that is not so easy! 
(Really, it just "depends".)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.