Re: George Dance's Trusted Source and Only Friend rates his poetry
[email protected] (NancyGene) Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:52:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.arts.poetry.comments |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: > [email protected] (NancyGene) wrote in > news:[email protected]: > > >> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: >> [email protected] (NancyGene) wrote in >> news:[email protected]: >> >> >> Michael Pendragon wrote: >> George J. Dance’s poetry rates roughly a 3.5 out of 10 from a >> traditional literary criticism perspective, reflecting its nature as >> informal, self-published digital verse rather than canonical >> literature.Context and StylePlatform: George J. Dance is a >> Toronto-based independent writer known for maintaining online spaces >> like Penny's Poetry Pages Wiki and publishing collections like >> Doggerel, and other Doggerel.Content: His writing leans heavily into >> conversational commentary, political observation, and light verse >> (as the title Doggerel self-acknowledges).Critical >> BreakdownTechnical Craft (3/10): The verse often lacks the tight >> meter, rich figurative language, and structural ambition expected of >> high-literary poetry, frequently reading more like journal entries >> or prose chopped into line breaks.Originality and Voice (4/10): >> While sincere and unpretentious, the themes are largely derivative >> of everyday political blogging and internet-era musings rather than >> breaking new stylistic ground.Authenticity of Purpose (5/10): The >> work scores higher if judged not as high art, but as a transparent, >> niche digital archive of personal and political commentary shared >> freely online. >> >> By comparison, the Trusted Source gave Will Dockery a 6 out of 10. >> It gave me a 6 out of 10 as well (I'm considering cutting my >> throat)... but hey, at least I scored almost twice as high as Dunce! >> >> >> >> George Dunce got lower points because most of his poems are >> co-written by Moose, and Moose are known more for their munch than >> their meter. >> >> >> >> That's funny. My pomes got an 8 out of 10. >> >> How trusted can that source be? >> >> -- >> "I've known for over a year that this guy is the assassin of the >> Usenet poetry community. When I first arrived, I thought he was >> keeping the lights on in a dead group by reposting from archives. I >> soon realized that he was just endlessly reposting his own stuff, >> that he had killed the group by flooding it, and that most of the >> people he called "trolls" were actually the members of the group. >> I've joined the crowd. I'm done trying to work with him and speak >> reason to him. It's exhausting and pointless." - Little Willie >> Douchebag gets another asskicking from The One True Melissa >> >> >> >> It is a true and honest source, untouched by bias. >> > > > I think Dreckweasel's rating was missing a decimal point before the "6"! > > ..6 out of 10 would be a little more in line from a talentless fool with > reading comprehension issues. > > -- > "I've known for over a year that this guy is the assassin of the Usenet > poetry community. When I first arrived, I thought he was keeping the > lights on in a dead group by reposting from archives. I soon realized > that he was just endlessly reposting his own stuff, that he had killed > the group by flooding it, and that most of the people he called > "trolls" were actually the members of the group. > I've joined the crowd. I'm done trying to work with him and speak reason > to him. It's exhausting and pointless." - Little Willie Douchebag gets > another asskicking from The One True Melissa They don't understand decimals in Shitholeville, and even if they did, they pronounce it "DESS mills." "Look it up." This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=709406140#709406140 -- Via JLA Forums web gateway for alt.arts.poetry.comments: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655