Re: Denim Blue Eyes

> George J. Dance wrote:
> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
> 
> 
>> George J. Dance <user2782> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>> 
>> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
>> 
>> Pickles and Liezlotz deserve scorn throughout eternity. One called
>> everyone pedophiles, the other was one. KKKluckles' disturbing
>> fantasies aside, there was just something fundamentally wrong with
>> him being such a pathological liar and being so bad at it.
>> 
>> Got it. One called you a pedophile, and you called the other one a
>> pedophile.
>> 
>> I have no doubt about KKKlucKKKles, he and Tommy Tosser were absolutely
>> disgusting people and flaunted his sickness too. I'm aware Nadless can
>> only lash out at anyone he can't respond to.
>> 
>> But for my own curiosity, who are the "three stooges" from your
>> perspective? From your phrasing, you're leaving the lovely and
>> talented NancyGene out of that set, so it also seems you left me out
>> by implication, or rather the lack thereof.
>> 
>> So let me guess! PJR, MMP and Mr. Senetto.
>> 
>> What did I win?
>> 
>> I remember replying to this, but here on newsgrouper my reply is
>> missing in this thread. So I'll put it back in "to set the record
>> straight" and all that:
>> 
>> I've already mentioned their names in this thread:
>> "... his 3 stooges (Jim, Corey and Robert)...."
>> But I'll admit that I don't talk about them much. Maybe I
>> should mention them more.
>> 
>> Those were the three contributors to /April/ magazine (the original
>> magazine for aapc members) who supported MMP's
>> claim that I'd "stolen" their poems because I had a copy of /April/
>> archived on the blog.
>> 
>> All of them demanded I remove those pages of /April/ from the
>> blog. Two of them joined MMP in falsely accusing me of "literary
>> theft" (even after I'd taken their poems out of publication) on the
>> group. At least one of them also joined MMP in writing to Google
>> telling them I'd published their poems without their permission (which
>> of course could have got my whole blog removed).
>> 
>> I called them "the three stooges" because (1) there were three of
>> them and (2) they were being MMP's stooges; they were believing
>> his bull and doing what he told them to do.
>> 
>> For some reason I wasn't around for this.
>> 
>> (Maybe I was but didn't read it. Same difference?)
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> If you were posting on aapc, you probably had more pressing things to look after.
> (It probably wasn't a big deal to anyone not personally involved.)
> 
> MMP and NG sometimes post about it, but if you heard their version you probably
> wouldn't realize they were talking about the same incident.



With their usual lies and misrepresentations, of course.

😏 


This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658993152#658993152

-- 
Via JLA Forums web gateway for alt.arts.poetry.comments:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655