Re: Observations on the Post Fauci Reveal [Expanded]

On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 18:42:07 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<[email protected]> wrote:

>https://ethicsalarms.com/2026/08/01/observations-on-the-post-fauci-reveal/
>
>Observations on the Post Fauci Reveal [Expanded]
>August 1, 2026 / Jack Marshall
>
>You know…when Dr. Fauci revealed himself to be a narcissist, a coward, a 
>fick, and an all-time American villain.
>
>The Fauci Ethics Train Wreck is yet another integrity test for the 
>American Left and the Axis of Unethical Conduct. It has flunked the 
>others, so it is not surprising that it is flunking this one. The 
>ethical course would be to admit the truth:
>
>“Yes, they were thrilled with the pandemic lockdown, because it wrecked 
>the Trump economy and gave them a chance to install a puppet President 
>who could be manipulated by extreme left unelected functionaries. Yes, 
>that made us especially willing to accept Dr. Fauci and Co.’s draconian 
>measures, especially since it gave Democratic elected officials an 
>opportunity to play dictator and constrain Americans’ civil rights in 
>the name of “safety.” Yes, we sanctified Dr. Fauci beyond all reason to 
>enhance our irresponsible “follow the science” grift, which has been so 
>successful in the climate change policy debate. Yes, we were complicit 
>in installing ruinous and unnecessary policies, based on panic that our 
>media sowed, that retarded a generation’s education and social 
>development, ruined businesses, permanently damaged whole industries, 
>and killed people.”
>
>Nah! That’s not how the American Left rolls in 2026. How much better it 
>is to deflect, lie, ignore multiple metaphorical elephants, and maintain 
>a position that has become completely untenable.
>
>The op-ed titled “What We Really Learned From the Fauci Hearing” (gift 
>link, but this is no present) from the New York Times could have been 
>designed by an AI bot with the instruction, “write an op-ed denying that 
>the Fauci hearing was what it was, using the topic to blame Republicans 
>while avoiding inconvenient facts.”
>
>This paragraph, near the end, is a masterpiece of dishonesty and sophistry:
>
>“Dr. Fauci is a complicated man who has been both elevated and reduced 
>to a symbol. His legacy after a decades-long career at the intersection 
>of science and politics is now defined by incompatible, contested 
>accounts of his pandemic-era impact. There is little hope of resolving 
>that contest any time soon.”
>
>“Complicated”! The smoking gun of brazen sophistry, prevarication and 
>equivocation. There’s noting complicated about Fauci. He’s a lifetime 
>bureaucrat who became intoxicated with power when the opportunity 
>arrived, and abused that power for the benefit his own ego, his 
>political party, and the detriment of millions. It is an old story. 
>Faucis have been analyzed by historians, playwrights and novelists for 
>centuries. “Complicated” is an anodyne, toothless word used to excuse 
>wrong-doers.
>
>The op-ed skirts the inconvenient fact that Fauci’s own diary, which he 
>foolishly posted on a government platform, completely verifies what Dr. 
>Rachael Bedard, one of the physicians in “Defend the hive!” mode calls 
>“the right’s portrayal of him as a self-regarding operator who was 
>flattered rather than humbled by the attention he received during a 
>national crisis.” But that description is also deceit. His celebratory 
>prose is trivial: what the diary reveals is that Fauci lied, knew he was 
>lying, abused his influence, and didn’t give a thought to who was being 
>harmed. Bedard doesn’t deal with those facts at all; it’s so much easier 
>to characterize the hearing, which sought to confront the liar with his 
>own words, as “theater” and “McCarthyism.”
>
>She writes,
>
>“But many of the entries being cited as evidence that Dr. Fauci lied to 
>the public or deliberately withheld information are really reminders of 
>how uncertain the context was for pandemic decision-making. Some of the 
>entries, in fact, give a useful glimpse into how decisions were hashed 
>out among experts with different perspectives and concerns, with Dr. 
>Fauci often playing the role of convener or informal chair.”
>
>Translation: ‘We get a useful glimpse of how health officials and other 
>government officials prefer to lie to the public, saying that they are 
>certain of conclusions that are speculative at best and demanding that 
>“experts” and “science” be accepted without question, in order to ensure 
>mindless compliance with edicts and policies that they know may be wrong.’
>
>The op-ed is damning evidence of how Fauci’s colleagues and peers will 
>abandon all principles to protect its turf, and how the New York Times 
>will publish pure disinformation and propaganda to bolster the Left when 
>its conduct is indefensible and accountability looms. Of course, the 
>Axis broadcast news media followed suit.
>
>Then consider this social media post from Chris Cuomo, ex-CNN sex 
>symbol, aka. “Fredo.”
>
>
>Don’t anyone admonish me again for using “Fredo” to mock Chris: I doubt 
>that even the dimmest Corleone brother would have been dumb enough to 
>post this in response to Fauci’s disgrace. I know, Chris somehow got a 
>law degree, but the comment is ignorant. Congress is supposed to conduct 
>hearings regarding matters of importance to the country, especially 
>disasters like its response to the pandemic. Fauci had evaded and lied 
>in earlier hearings, and his self-indicting diary entrees demanded 
>Congressional inquiry. He was correctly called to testify, Sen. Paul 
>accurately cited what the evidence appears to show, and Fauci retreated 
>behind the Fifth Amendment.
>
>That’s not Congressional “lawfare,” and Fauci had the opportunity to 
>supply answers. And what relevance is it that Fauci is Fredo’s “friend”? 
>Among the less obscene responses Chris’s tweet received, all noting that 
>he was complicit in spreading the Left’s pandemic propaganda was this one:
>
>“Chris isn’t it kind of stressful sticking up for a guy with this diary 
>entry: “We can’t admit the shots don’t work because it will make it 
>harder to force people to get them.” Right?
>
>Bingo. The fact that an ethics-challenged fool was hired by CNN and 
>allowed to make viewers dumber for so long stands as a monument to the 
>Ethics Alarms mantra, “Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias.” No 
>legitimate journalism organization would tolerate an idiot like Cuomo. 
>True, ABC stuck with Sam Donaldson, but compared to Chris he was H.L. 
>Mencken.
>
>Then we have the elected officials who perfectly embody one of my 
>father’s favorite lines, “My mind’s made up, don’t confuse me with 
>facts!” Here is the long-time Democrat hack Sen. Dick Durbin (EA dossier 
>here) just plain lying:
>
>
>If Fauci cares so much, how is it that while extolling himself and 
>crowing about how much fun it was to be beloved, nowhere in his diaries 
>does he express any concern for the people his policies were harming? 
>Rand Paul wasn’t trying to question Fauci about “conspiracy theories.” 
>He was, again, trying to confront the man with his own words. And lies.
>
>Nellie Bowles at the Free Press makes a reasonable assessment of what 
>was going on in Fauci’s mind:
>
>“He loved being a celebrity. The thing about it is, he really was being 
>worshipped! There was a cult of Fauci. People were getting Fauci tattoos 
>and dancing with images of Fauci. He really was on the cover of every 
>magazine, which, if you think about it, was weird! If millions of 
>Americans suddenly made me their cult leader, and I had previously just 
>been an unknown short man in the back of an HIV press conference, I 
>would go insane with power too. So would you. And when you see lockdowns 
>in the context of a power-drunk elf getting turned on by the idea of 
>canceling Easter—he’s typing so fast he can barely keep up—you can 
>understand better what we all lived through. For him, the pleasure was 
>canceling things, especially things he felt gave power to the right 
>(sports, family gatherings, religious events).”
>
>Translation:
>
>
>No, I would not react as Nellie says she would, because power and 
>position must be accompanied by humility, care, courage, sacrifice and 
>perspective. I know many, indeed most, sudden celebrities abuse their 
>new-found status, but Fauci was a public servant, and had a higher 
>responsibility. He was a professional, and professionals must be 
>trustworthy.
>
>I did see a ray of hope from the news media. ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith, 
>who was all in during the pandemic, savaging athletes who objected to 
>being forced to get the vaccine shots and boosters, publicly apologized 
>to NBA star Kyrie Irving for calling him “selfish.”
>
>Smith said:
>
>“I watched Dr. Fauci on Capitol Hill yesterday, and the person I thought 
>about most was Kyrie Irving. He stood out in my mind because of the heat 
>that he was taking… He refused the vaccine. New York City’s mandate made 
>him ineligible for home games, and he linked his stance to people losing 
>jobs over vaccine mandates. In my opinion, particularly hindsight-wise, 
>it didn’t make him stubborn or selfish. It made him brave. His 
>willingness to stand up and say, ‘Nah, I’m not doing that.’ It’s just a 
>time for reflection — to look at things differently. Kyrie gave up 
>$11,400,000 in game checks during the 21-22 NBA season and a 
>$100,000,000 extension with the Nets to be unvaccinated. That cements 
>his holdout as the largest financial sacrifice any athlete has ever made 
>over an issue in history.”
>
>Some people, at least, have the integrity to admit they were wrong.
>
>An important question that needs to be answered, speaking of conspiracy 
>theories: Was Fauci working for the Axis, deliberately trying to wreck 
>Trump’s economy to put a Democrat in the White House, or was he a 
>“useful idiot,” enabling a corrupt political party without that being on 
>his agenda? The Biden pardon certainly points in the conspiracy 
>direction; so does the Axis denial of Fauci’s wrongs. It is also true 
>that the behavior of Democratic officials strongly suggested that they 
>weren’t taking the pandemic as the serious threat that their allies were 
>fearmongering to the public:
>
>
>I tend to believe that Fauci’s service to the Left was indispensable, 
>significant but inadvertent. Together, however, they were complicit in 
>one of the great public policy disasters in U.S. history.


The fault for COVID lies directly with the untermensch with
slant-eyes. That you found a simpleton coon to place the blame
elsewhere is immoral.