Re: All things are full of gods
Paul S Person <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:52:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.books.inklings,alt.books,alt.mythology,alt.christnet.theology,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 07:58:46 +0200, Steve Hayes <[email protected]> wrote: >I've seen quite a lot of mentions on social media of a book with the >title "All things are full of gods", so I looked it up on GoodReads, >and found that no one had written a review of it there yet. > ><https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/210129380-all-things-are-full-of-go= ds >> > >Has anyone here read it? > >Any comments? > >I was quite intrigued by the title, which seems to be rather >anti-modernity, because modernity maintains that all things are NOT >full of gods. As one modernist theologian put it, some 60 years ago: > >Desacralization modernity. > Source: Cox, "The Secular City". 1965:36. > "We should oppose the romantic restoration of the sprites of > the forest. It may seem pleasant at first to reinstate the > leprechauns, but - as Hitler made all too clear - once the > Valkyries return, they will seek a bloodthirsty revenge on > those who banished them. We should also be wary of any attempt > to resacralize politics. Political leaders and movement should > never be granted any sacred significance, and all efforts to > use public authority to support traditional religious beliefs > or the quasi-religious beliefs of ideological secularism must > be resisted." > >I half agree. That's more than I can say. I read that in the early 70s. I thought (perhaps "imagined" would be more accurate) that I understood it. I re-read it a few years ago. I didn't understand it at all. I disposed of it, probably in a metallic book donation bin. So I can't say whether I agree or not, since the whole thing was opaque to me. >The supreme example of granting political leaders sacred significance >was the ancient Roman religion of emperor worship, and similar cults >of political leaders continue or are revived in modern times, and are >to be deprecated. There is a theory that this was done to provide all residents of the Roman Empire with /one/ god they could /all/ acknowledge, thus building a sense of unity. That's the problem with polytheistic societies that are /very/ tolerant of other people's gods: no unifying god. >But when St Paul says our struggle is not against blood and flesh, but >against the rulers, the authorities, the world powers of this present >darkness (Eph 6:10-12) I believe he is saying that systemic evil is >demonic. These demons have been given different names at different >times. That is a reasonable interpretation, although, AFAIK, the actual context of his remarks is unknown -- presumably, there was a philosophical or religious (and, since Paul was a Jew, probably Jewish) position that posited rule of the world by, indeed, demons in effect if not in name. One of the books in /The Nag Hammadi Library in English/ is titled "The Hypostasis of the Archons", which the translators translate in their introduction as "The Reality of the Rulers", so I (at least) wonder if Paul was into something that eventually produced Gnosticism. >Back in the days of apartheid, here in South Africa we often just >spoke of "the System", and in North America they spoke of "the >military-industrial complex".=20 > >All things are full of gods, but not all gods are good, or >well-disposed. > >Back in the secular sixties Western theologians were concerned to =20 >demythologise the Christian faith. But there seems to be a rapidly >growing field of scholarship that concerns itself mostly with those >who in that period tried to remythologise it, such as the Inklings -- >J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams et al. Relatively little >attention is paid nowadays to the demythologisers.=20 I once rendered one of these guys speechless by pointing out that, having demythologized the Christian faith of its ancient imagery, it would then be necessary to re-mythologize it in modern imagery. Apparently, he really /believed/ that his high-level sophisticated intellectualism was free of all imagery but was a plain unvarnished view of reality. Well, in all fairness, Moses probably felt the same way when he came down from the mountain. It is an easy delusion to slip into. --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"