Re: Just facts - from EPREL on overall mobile device endurance - no assessments

On 2025-07-04 14:13, Marion wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:05:30 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :
> 
> 
>> I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.
>> Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.
>>
>> And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate
>> the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.
> 
> I'm a scientist and an engineer so I especially delve into benchmarks.
> In this case, we need to separate the smartphones from the tablets.
> Because they're inherently different in that tablets have better batteries.
> 
> Brand Comparison (All using Apple-style truncated values):
>   Samsung Average endurance 73.07 hours (from 28 models)
>   Apple Average endurance 63.1 hours (from 19 models)
>   Google Average endurance 48.0 hours (from 5 models)

What are there average efficiency scores?

> 
> Breakdown by tablets versus smartphones in the EPREL database:
>   Apple 16 smartphones, 3 tablets
>   Samsung 22 smartphones, 6 tablets
>   Google 5 smartphones, 0 tablets
> 
> Quick summary of the math.
>   Apple smartphones:
>   Values = 62, 72, 67, 72, 67, 62, 41, 67, 67, 37, 48, 48, 37, 34, 45, 40
>   Total = 1,070h, Average = 66.9 hours
> 
>   Apple Tablets:
>   Values = 73, 73, 77
>   Total = 223h, Average = 74.3 hours
> 
>   Samsung Smartphones:
>   Models with typical identifiers (e.g. SM-A, SM-G, SM-S):
>   Values = 40, 38, 37, 45, 41, 43, 44, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 41, 44,
>            38, 43, 44, 37, 41, 42, 41, 41
>   Total = 906h, Average = 41.2 hours
>   
>   Samsung Tablets:
>   Models starting with SM-X:
>   Values = 98, 55, 142, 142, 96, 99
>   Total = 632h, Average = 105.3 hours
> 
>   Google Smartphones only (no tablets):
>   Values = 49, 50, 40, 49, 52
>   Total = 240h, Average = 48.0 hours
> 
> Summary of averages by brand & type:
>   Smartphones Apple 66.9h Samsung 41.2h Google 48.0h
>   Tablets Apple 74.3h Samsung 105.3h Google (none)
> 
> Looking at tablets only, Samsung dominates with especially high endurance
> numbers over Apple (Google doesn't seem to have tablets sold in the EU).
> 
> Looking at smartphones, Apple shows a clear lead over both Samsung and
> Google in terms of benchmarked battery endurance cycle performance metrics.

Again: no real scientist would compare things this way.