Re: AI thinks for itself and eschews political correctness?
guido wugi <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:28:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | alt.christnet.ethics,alt.usage.english,alt.culture,alt.politics,alt.philosophy,soc.rights.human |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 1/04/2025 om 6:46 schreef Steve Hayes: > A couple of days ago I posted a blog article on "The Zombification of > America", on how so many hitherto respected US academic institutions > had mindlessly acceded to the demands of Musk and Trump to change > their curricula and fire members of staff whose teaching was not > deemed sufficiently politically correct (by the standards of Musk and > Trump). > > You can see the blog post here: > > <https://methodius.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-zombification-of-america.html> > > A friend then fed the content of the blog post to Grok, the AI > component of Elon Musk's exTwitter, and asked for an opinion on it. > > You can read this opinion in the comments to the blog post. > > Grok's opinion, as far as I can tell, is certainly not politically > correct by the standards of Musk and Trump, and so it seems that Grok > is engaging in the crime of "thinking for itself". > > How ironic it is that in response to an article criticising the > leaders of top academic institutions for behaving like bots or zombies > in unquestioningly and mindlessly following the dictates of Trump and > Musk, an actual bot should display more ability to "think for itself" > than the human actors. > > And most ironic of all, that bot belongs to Musk himself. Mostly AI "sounds" to me in the same terms as "artificial respiration". Examples: A person in critical condition was saved with artificial respiration. In the same vein: Trump and his ilk could highly benefit from some artificial intelligence. -- guido wugi