Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, theo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 3:01 am, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 4, 5:38 am, "Neosapienis" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I am not condemning him for reading the Bible as much as I am for com=
ing to
> > > false conclusions and then purporting them to be true.
>
> > > Anyone who is opposed to human nudity in my book is either a fascist =
or a
> > > Nazi.
>
> > > --
>
> > > Best wishes,
>
> > > Dario Western
>
> > And should be killed, right?  That's what you said. You want someone
> > to put a bullet in that guy's head.
>
> I must have missed where he said that. Could you please point it out.
>
> Theo

"Public nudity is sin: Public nudity is sin and should evoke shame.
That some are not ashamed reveals more about their spiritual
deprivation than about whether public nudity is sin or not. Zephaniah
said, =93=85the unjust knows no shame=94 (Zephaniah 3:5). Public nudity is
humanity at the sensual level, and draws us away from God=92s way and
elicits lust, jeopardizes marriage, and potentiates adultery,
fornication=85.."


In response Dario Said:

Somebody go to this preacher's place and put a bullet in his brain for
me,
hey?  I have never seduced anyone's spouse nor worshipped a pagan sex
God
with my nudism (which 'fornication' actually means).