Re: Gypsy Taub Interviews Nudists Julie and Rich

"David Looser" <[email protected]> wrote in 
news:[email protected]:

> "Terry J. Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...

>> JESUS had more of a beef with bankers than he did with homosexuals.
 
> Don't we all!!
 
>:-)

I have problems with "bankers" that run Ponzi schemes! :-)


More to the point, if one argues that Jesus didn't mention homosexuality 
because he was in complete agreement with Leviticus, then one would have 
to accept that Jesus must have wanted you to follow all of Leviticus to 
the letter.  He didn't say not to.  So he must have meant to follow it 
strictly.  Right?  How could he have meant for one part to be followed 
to the letter, but exclude all the rest?

If the argument is that Jesus was opposed to homosexuality because of 
Leviticus, he therefore would be opposed to you having that shrimp 
cocktail too!  You better not eat the fruit from your fruit trees for 
the first 5 years as well.  No shaving your beard or trimming the sides 
of your head either.  Better make those burnt-offering soon too!  That 
fancy suit of your probably isn't just woven from one fiber, so out it 
goes!

In short, if Christians have a problem with homosexuals and want to use 
Jesus and Leviticus as justification then they have a lot of explaining 
as to why they follow some parts of Leviticus and other parts can be 
ignored.

Isn't eating shrimp just as big a sin as being a homosexual?  Won't you 
go to Hell for either one?  A sin is a sin is a sin!

BTW, Jesus CLEARLY had problems with bankers, but I see that Christians 
don't have a problem going to the bank or being a banker.