Re: Why I Went Cold Turkey on Political Theology
Steve Hayes <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Apr 2024 04:46:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | alt.christnet.rightwing.loonies,alt.politics.religion,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.christian,alt.christnet.ethics,alt.christnet.theology |
|---|---|
| Organization | Khanya Publications |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:57:09 -0500, "Richard Carl Silk" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hey Steve: If theology has left you feeling cold, here's a *short* something >that *may* warm you back up again: I never said theology had left me cold. It was Alastair Roberts who said that he went cold turkey on *political* theology - to "go cold turkey" doesn't mean that it leaves you cold, it means that you suddenly abandon something to which you were addicted. And in this case what he suddenly abandoned was a certain kind of right-wing political theology. >https://tinyurl.com/itta-TCoU (If you're fearful of links, let me know, and >I'll copy / paste the short story into a post here for you, but it may be awhile >before I circle back around to this group.) I'm not fearful of links, but I don't normally follow links that give no indication of their subject. So does your link lead to anything that has to do with theonomic reconstructionism or a critique of the same? Or is Usenet now so dead that an ontopic response is the last thing one would expect? All the response this post has got has been random and irrelevant quotes (apparently from a bot) and an unsupported link. -- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com For information about why crossposting is (usually) good, and multiposting (nearly always) bad, see: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost