Re: Toolwiz TimeFreeze
"p-0 0-h the cat (coder) <[email protected]>"
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware |
|---|---|
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/06/2024 09:55, Allan Higdon wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:40:14 -0500, wasbit <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 20/06/2024 01:11, p-0 0-h the cat (coder) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 18/06/2024 21:11, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> (You have to download from the Major Geek site. I think the site for >>>> Timefreeze no longer has it for download. >>> >>> Well I couldn't find anything on Wayback past 2015. The changelog link >>> on Major Geeks doesn't work. I think 2015 was the last I could find on >>> Wayback. 'Security program' last developed 9-10 years ago. Is that so? >>> Do you have any evidence to the contrary? >>> >> >> I didn't install it but got as far as being able to select an >> installation directory with a warning that it required 1GB of space. >> >> - http://w.toolwiz.com/lead/toolwiz_time_freeze/ >> >> > > I tried it out in October and preferrred it to Sandboxie Plus for > testing software. > https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware/c/bkylOivrKqg/m/ayet2_ShAAAJ Few questions Did you install this on your main workstation/lappy or do you have a testing PC/lappy in case it happens? If the latter, would you install this on your main workstation or lappy? The question I ask myself is why would I use what looks to me quite an invasive program when I have other options like VMWare Workstation with a Linux VM to browse safely or use Tails, I get Tor, Linux and the OS stored on a flash drive. I don't usually test software without a fair bit of research and if there's any doubt I install on a test machine. Why then should I use this? I'm struggling to see the benefit vs the risk in positive terms. What OS did you use? Can you still check what the version is? and any date stamp for compilation, any info like that. Do you know if this is still supported or developed in any way? In your opinion is this really just suitable for testing software and if so what features make its use a preferable choice to the other options I mentioned earlier. Thx. Luv Pooh. p-0.0-h the cat, the number one influencer on the Usenet Social! Live everyday like you're a really cool cat! Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, Pooh Dendum, scouringerer, jumped up chav, punk ass dole whore troll, no nothing innumerate religious maniac, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, professional bully and stalker, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896 I mark any messages from trolls »Q« and 'Arlene' Holder as stinky