Re: Yes, A 'FREE' End To End Encrypted Email Provider? TUTA! 062024
Anonymous <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware,alt.privacy.anon-server |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]> the tuta spammer wrote: >In article <[email protected]> Anonymous wrote: >> In article <[email protected]> the tuta spammer wrote: >> >> > You don't need 'danner crap' software on your computer to send an anonymous message! >> >> Hard to sell your snooping tuta sh*t when there's free and secure OmniMix, right? > >With Tor Browser Bundle Circuits of three Tor nodes are NOT SECURE, preppy. > you sign-up, Sign up where? > while using an OS like Tails, >Qubes or Whonix and use pure YAMN, pure Mixmaster or pure GnuPG for >Cypherpunk Remailers. Pure? When you have to sign up somewhere? Maybe even with unknown active contents allowed to run on your computer? I smell snake oil! I tell you what's pure: Direct packet delivery from your computer to all entry remailers through extended Tor circuits. Any further intermediary like your fuck*ng tuta sh*t means nothing but trouble! > >No need to install tons of MB for 'wine' and Omnimix under Linux. I agree. No need, as long as there's no need for true anonymity. > >Reading news can be done with Tor Browser Bundle and http://put.hk I see, no newsreader, no mail client. You're targeting the HTML generation, aren't you? But are those naive creatures really Linux users, dumbo? Btw, my Tor Browser wasn't able to establish any HTTPS connection with that dubious .hk site, which tries to offers mostly news servers out of service for years and misses the whole alt.* hierarchy. Furthermore, we all know, that .hk is much more trustworthy than .cn, right? Oh boy! When will you stop making a tit out of yourself and leave?