Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT?

c186282 <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:11:26 -0400

Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Organization	wokiesux
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 7/2/26 17:26, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:50:44 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
>> On 7/2/26 02:04, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2026 1:56 PM, c186282 wrote:
>>>> On 7/1/26 11:41, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see the world with my naked eyes. NOT wearing mathematical
>>>>> eyeglasse. :)
>>>>
>>>>      Then you're only seeing half of it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, is the other half of it FLAT? ;)
>>
>>
>>     No, the most detailed tapestry ever.
>>
>>     The Numbers can take you far beyond anything your senses can deliver,
> 
> Spoken like a true Pythagorean. Their Numbers were as real as Plato's
> Forms.

   Well, they were kind of NEW at the numbers
   back then  :-)

   Quantum mechanics came along a bit later.

> I've always thought it odd 'Platonic realism' refers to the unreal.

   IS kinda odd.

   Anyway, The Numbers have improved, and improved our
   understanding, over time - 'philosophy', not so much.
   Same old bullshitting about bullshit under the delusion
   that Answers will arise.

   Or maybe just that if you confuse people enough they
   will drop coins on yer collection plate ?  :-)