Re: How much latency do you add to torrents?

Oliver <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:34:05 -0700
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy,alt.comp.issues.privacy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:52:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris <[email protected]> wrote 

>> What if you happen to be gay, for example, and you downloaded gay movies.
> 
> Ignoring the latent homophobia, what on earth is a "gay movie"!? I didn't
> realise that gay people had their own film catalogue. If I watch one does
> that make me gay?

You're not supposed to argue the analogy in detail - it's just an example.
Please pick a *different* example if you don't like the example used.

What example do you want us to use to portray that privacy is a good thing?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=examples+of+where+privacy+is+a+good+thing

>> It's not illegal but you'd still want to have some anonymity when doing it.
>> 
>> Anyway, the question has been fleshed out that there is value to adding
>> random latency between the act of obtaining a magnet & the act of using it.
> 
> No it hasn't. One person has maybe been persuaded by your paranoia around
> "them" spying on you based on no facts at all. 

I can see you don't like latency for some reason, but are you the same guy
who argued that the word used in technical privacy discussions is "delay"?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=latency+versus+delay

If that was you (and it might not have been you), then whoever that person
was, knows absolutely nothing about the use of latency in privacy.

If that was not you, you *still* show zero knowledge of the use of latency.
Please read at least one article on latency *before* outputting a response.

https://duckduckgo.com/&q=how+is+latency+used+in+privacy

>> The only question to be answered here is how much time most people wait.
> 
> You mean how much time people are willing to "waste". 

It's unfortunate that you show zero knowledge about the legitimate and
well-verified use of latency in privacy so before you respond to this,
please bring your knowledge level up somewhat from rock bottom nothing.

> Everyone has acknowledged no negative repercussions to their current
> behaviour. There's no need to be act any different.

You need to know at least one something about latency to argue against it.

Read at least one of the articles that result from a search on the topic.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+is+latency+used+in+privacy

Please reference the article you read (so that I can read it also) when you
respond, or there will be no reason to continue such a baseless discussion.