Re: piping / redirecting into a vbs script ?

R.Wieser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Frank,
> 
> >  If you think Newyana2 needs to "back up" his "unsolvable puzzles"
> > statement, you may want to enroll in Logic 101.
> 
> :-) I did not expect him to prove it.  I'm not /that/ daft.

  <whoosh!>

  I think somebody complained about people not reading what was written,
but going off on a tangent. Who was that again!?

> But I think I may expect him to be able to explain /why/ he thinks its
> unsolvable.  Otherwise his classification isn't worth the ink its written
> with.

  Sorry, same logical fallacy.

> And pardon me, I've more than once encountered people who use similar claims
> just because they either could not grasp the problem, or didn't actually
> want to try to solve it.  You know, <whining>Its too *hard*</whining>.

  I vaguely remember mentioning it's always the other guy's fault.
> 
> >  I've noted you tend to emit this logical fallacy when you get
> > too worked up (which is a quite common occurence). There's a
> > lesson in there.
> 
> I disagree.  See above.

  Another locigal fallacy.

> But, if you can quote something specific we could always discuss it.  For
> some odd reason I've got very little problem with being proven wrong.

  Yep, and I've a 300-metre steel tower in Paris for sale, real cheap,
honest!