Re: Today is....
Ben Holmes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 05:03:45 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thursday, December 21, 2023 at 5:38:56?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >> But yet you, Ben, NTF, and Gil have all declined to engage in any discussion of LiftonÂs theory. > >I decline because I have no idea what you're talking about. Surprising nobody at all - Huckster ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to cite for this mythical "Lifton theory." It simply is, what he *SAYS* it is. I call him a liar. >This is the first I've heard that Lifton had a theory that all the shooters were in front of the car. >I don't know anything about it, I haven't studied it and ( unlike you ) I prefer not to discuss things I haven't studied or have no knowledge of. >Most of my research is on the evidence in the case against Oswald. > >What's next ? >The theory that Greer turned around and shot Kennedy ? >The theory that Hickey shot Kennedy ? >The theory that the Mafia killed Kennedy ? >The theory that the Russians did it ? >The theory that is was Castro ? >What about the theory that Jackie had JFK killed ? > >You see, I don't get involved in theories, just like I don't get involved in interpretations of pictures. >Interpreting pictures is like a Rorschach test: different people can see different things. >All it is is a rabbit hole and I don't go down those. > >So pardon me if I excuse myself from your little debate about Lifton's theory. >It's just not something I know anything about.