Re: Hard Scientific Evidence...
Bud <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy.jfk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, December 22, 2023 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: > HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE... > > The "hard evidence" of the 6.5mm virtually round object in the AP > X-ray... You refuse to take this anywhere. > The "hard evidence" of the medically observed appearance of the bullet > wound in the throat... You refuse to show how this is hard evidence. > The "hard evidence" of clothing, which was irrationally refused to the > prosectors for examination. You refuse to show this is hard evidence. > The "hard evidence" of autopsy photos & X-rays that have disappeared. You refuse to show they have. > The "hard evidence" of photos showing a bullet being recovered in the > grass. You refuse to show this bullet. > The "hard evidence" of Frazier - and how the Warren Commission went > 'expert shopping' to find Nicol... You refuse to show how Frazier is hard evidence. You refuse to show the WC went witness shopping. > The "hard evidence" of a fingerprint in the 'sniper's nest' that was > never identified. You refuse to show this is significant. > The "hard evidence" of NAA testing that was concealed by the Warren > Commission. (and lied about to this very day) You refuse to produce this testing. > The "hard evidence" of rifle testing, where the Warren Commission used > real experts, firing from half the height, at oversized stationary > targets with all the time they wanted for the first shot. If you don`t like the testing ignore the results, stupid. > The "hard evidence" of the lack of 'First Frame Flash' in the extant > Zapruder film - the very same error that proved the 'alien autopsy' > film a fake. You refuse to show this "first frame flash" in other places the film stops and starts. > The "hard evidence" of the curb near Tague being patched. Tell us > about the ballistic path of that bullet. Shifting the burden. > Believers can run, but they can't address the hard evidence in this > case... to say nothing about the eyewitness testimony... Seems the usual bunch of meaningless noise.