Re: The Truth That WCR Believers Run From... #1

On Sunday, December 31, 2023 at 5:04:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Sunday, December 31, 2023 at 12:37:05 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote: 
> > We don't have a "scenario" separate from the historical null hypothesis. And you've never posted a scenario. Ever. Your multi-segment Magnum Opus is simply your usually begged questions and other assorted logical fallacies.
> > Who?
> > They all believed Oswald shot JFK. You and Gil are among a dwindling band of aging, dope smoking baby boomers who are on the radical fringes of a dying hobby who thing Oswald was a misunderstood sort of anti-hero railroaded for a crime he was 100% innocent of being involved in. Boris the Truther, Gentleman Don Willis, The Toilet, etc. all disagree with you. You all have weird, wild theories that sharply disagree with each other. Different captains on different ships, etc.
> > Cite that this is the FBI's "official" policy.
> > Nah. Oswald Alone is the historically accepted conclusion. Even JFK's library posts links to the WCR for people who want to learn more about the assassination. No links to your Magnum Opus or to The Tom Rossley Collection at Gil's website.
> > From what? Stop shifting the burden and produce something before the lights go out here.
> > If I recall, Conan posted here for a hot few minutes, figured out you were a troll, and left. Smart.
> > No critic at this board--at least since I've posted here for two decades--has ever posted a scenario. Ever.
> > ...in your opinion. 
> 
> > ...in your opinion.
> > You'll never post a scenario. Start with telling us what time JFK's body arrived at Bethesda.
> > And these are connected to the Dealey Plaza hit? How? You haven't even shown a conspiracy on 11/22/63.
> > You beg the question by assuming these are connected to Oswald somehow.
> > Kid molested at the Encino Judo Club? Check Ben's alibi first.
> > Melodramatic hogwash.
> > The Hobby ends its run at this board on February 22nd. You've got less than eight weeks of trolling left.
> Notice that all of Chuckles' responses contain: 
> 
> No citations 
> No documents 
> No testimony 
> No exhibits 
> No witness videos 
> No links 

  What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
> What Charles Schuyler DOES post are comments, speculations, opinions and insults. 
> Charles Schuyler does no research of his own. 

  Just coming here is research, to see if you guys have any valid ideas. So far nothing.
 
> He acts like a 10 year old online, insulting people and making fun of their names. 

  Do you even read what Ben writes?

> Lurkers can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from his posts. 

  Plenty of insight into the minds of conspiracy hobbyists.

  Coming here for decades I`ve acquired an intimate understanding of the workings of the minds of the conspiracy-afflicted.

  They cherry pick the wrong things to focus on, while being totally blind to the right things. Anything to get to where they are desperate to go.

> That's why we call Charles Schuyler, "Chuckles the Clown". 

  Clowns can take the greasepaint off whenever they like. You are stuck in your skin, you are a stump for life.
 
> And to his resume' he adds that he is a coward who avoided responding to 39 of the 40 questions I posted. 
> Then lied about it and said he answered them all. 

  The answer he gave covered most of them.
 
> Chuckles is a closed-minded, hate-filled, coward and a liar 
> who lives in a fantasy world where there is no such thing as corruption and it is impossible to get away with murder.

  Using your thinking (such as it is), since Charles Whitman shot all those people on his own, then Oswald acted likewise.

 And it isn`t that it is impossible to get away with murder. It is that the ideas you hint at, but never completely spell out or put into a cohesive package, are impossible.