Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules

joes <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:53:58 -0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups comp.theory,alt.crackpot
Organization i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 07:58:27 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/13/2024 3:52 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:12:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 6/12/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/12/24 12:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/12/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/11/24 11:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 9:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 8:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 7:20 PM, Python wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 12/06/2024 à 01:23, olcott a écrit :

>>>> Which is DEFINED to be the behavior of the program described by the
>>>> input when directly run.
>>> *If that was true then you could show ALL OF THE DETAILED STEPS*
>>> *of the mapping that H(D,D) computes to derive that behavior*
>> Any UTM/simulator does it. But H must halt, so it's wrong on non-
>> terminating inputs.
A decider must halt. A simulator must have the same behaviour and can't
abort a nonterminating program. A halting decider is impossible.

-- 
joes