Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- specification
joes <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:09:27 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | comp.theory,alt.crackpot |
|---|---|
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:10:21 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 6/13/2024 3:49 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:25:14 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 6/12/2024 6:03 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 6/12/24 12:57 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/12/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 6/11/24 11:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 9:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 7:23 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 5:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 1:12 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 6:47 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 12:31 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/24 10:06 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 6:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/24 11:54 PM, olcott wrote: >>> *H DOES NOT simply guess what you think it should do and do that* >> It has a *specification* it must fulfill. > The specification is only in your own mind and cannot be encoded as a > program/input pair. Right, because halting is undecidable. The specification is: return the halting status of every machine, including D, which contradicts its own output. -- joes