Re: BREAKING NEWS: Nudists Charged in Child Sex Case!!!!!

On Apr 15, 8:52 pm, "Neosapienis" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Dave,

> I take it that you are referring to The Grand Barn, no?  If they catered to
> swingers and fetishists, who are consenting adults, so what?  If they didn't
> include kids when catering to these people, what business was it of yours to
> tell them how to bog off from your organisation?

Because his organization was a NUDIST organization. And since he cares
about nudism it made it his business.

Remember nudism is NONSEXUAL social nudity. Being a member of a nudist
organization is supposed to mean that is what the member and the
member's venue is about.  But obviously that isn't what The Grand Barn
was about so by being a member of a nudist organization it was false
advertising and in the process giving a false impression of nudism
(well I hope the impression is false but then again look at the Four
Seasons and Paradise Lakes).

All he did was ask for truth in advertising. I don't see anything
wrong about that. Just a little honestly about what the place is about
and the place isn't about nudism so shouldn't be a member of a nudist
organization which gives the place an impression that it is.

Dario, I am disappointed you don't understand that.