"Martin Luther King, Jr.: Whitewashed by Radical Leftists!"

When tyrants take control of a free society they always do two 
things: they take guns from everyone and rewrite history. They 
make the tyrants into national saviors and turn those opposed to 
tyranny into thugs. This rewriting of history is happening as I 
write. Martin Luther King, Jr. has been reworked, repackaged, 
and remade into a secular saint by desperate people who can’t 
argue the issue on its merits but must stoop to manufactured 
mythology.

Recently, Oliver Stone dropped out of writing and directing the 
much anticipated MLK film because the King people in Atlanta 
rejected his script. They refused to permit the truth being told 
since Stone planned to deal with “issues of adultery, conflicts 
within the movement, and King’s spiritual transformation.” It is 
incredible that honest people do not demand the truth, however 
unpleasant, about their heroes. It seems that those who lean 
left are basically dishonest people who will do anything to 
preserve their myths. King’s family and other leftists are still 
white-washing his image; after all, big bucks are involved as 
everyone knows who has dealt with King’s family.

Since this is a national holiday, in the interest of truth, I 
present the following incontrovertible facts about King. My 
readers can then decide if I’m a racist or a realist interested 
in truth.

King was a pinko: King’s very liberal biographer, David J. 
Garrow, wrote: “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” 
The Rev. Uriah J. Fields, King’s secretary during the early 
stage of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, wrote, “King helps to 
advance Communism. He is surrounded with communists.”

Liberal black newspaper columnist Carl Rowan attended National 
Security Council meetings and was permitted to see confidential 
FBI files on King. Rowan said that King was known to be a 
Communist since May of 1962 when King’s name was “placed in 
Section A …tabbed Communist” in the FBI’s files. William 
Sullivan, Assistant Director of the FBI, concluded at the time, 
King was “the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation 
from the standpoint of communism, the Negro, and national 
security.” Sullivan was a major supporter of King!

King was a philander: Roman Catholic priest Richard John Neuhaus 
said of King: “Dr. King was, for all that was great about him, 
an adulterer, sexual libertine, lecher, and wanton womanizer.” 
That’s from a friend!

King’s friendly biographer, David J. Garrow revealed to USA 
Today King’s justification for his sexual immorality: “He [King] 
explained it as someone on the road 27 days a month and needing 
sex as a form of anxiety reduction and for emotional solace.” 
Oh, well, that makes his adultery and betrayal of his marriage 
vows and ordination vows acceptable–maybe even commendable!

An AP article should be a knockout blow for those who worship at 
King’s image with its heading, “FBI and Abernathy Say King Was a 
Sex-obsessed ‘Tomcat.’” That was followed with a graphic 
description of King’s last night on earth. “The Rev. Martin 
Luther King Jr. spent parts of the night before his 
assassination with two women and then fought physically with a 
third, according to the memoirs of the Rev. Ralph David 
Abernathy, King’s top aide.” Preachers are supposed to “fight a 
good fight” but King perverted that teaching–in spades.

Assistant Director of the FBI Charles D. Brennan wrote a letter 
to Senator John P. East of North Carolina in which he stated 
that King’s activities consisted of “orgiastic and adulterous 
escapades, some of which indicated that King could be bestial in 
his sexual abuse of women.”

King was a pervert: Black columnist Carl Rowan reported that the 
FBI tapes suggest that there was a homosexual relationship 
between King and his “best friend” Ralph Abernathy! Black talk 
show host and columnist Tony Brown added more light on this 
possibility when he reported on King’s banter to Abernathy in 
one of their hotel rooms. However, it was so vulgar, I will not 
even disguise King’s request to his “best friend.”

Martin was a prevaricator: The head of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, 
said that King was the “most notorious liar” in America and also 
said that “King is a tom cat with obsessive degenerate urges.” 
King also lied about his name all his life; he lied to his 
ordination committee; he lied to his wife; he lied on his 
college and seminary papers; he lied in his books; he lied when 
he said he fired Communists on his payroll; he lied when he said 
that twice as many blacks died in Vietnam than whites. Hoover 
was right.

King was a plagiarist: King stole from others all his lifetime 
as was supported by King’s people in Atlanta! “King’s plagiarism 
was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic 
writings….We found that instances of textual appropriation can 
be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his 
dissertation. The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and 
sermons throughout his career.” Note King’s family excused his 
plagiarism calling it “textual appropriation.”

King’s biographer David J. Garrow states: “King’s academic 
compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost 
without exception little more than summary descriptions…and 
comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost 
always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting 
that King’s professors did not expect more….” Why did they not 
expect more? It is a fact that King stole 66% of his Ph.D. 
dissertation! It seems Boston University wanted to give a 
doctorate to an unqualified and dishonest man, therefore played 
the game.

In his seminary papers, King reproduced the research and 
writings of others but he also incorporated their many errors, 
grammatical as well as theological!

King was a phony: In another paper King wrote that “the orthodox 
view of the divinity of Christ is in my mind quite readily 
denied.” He other papers King denied Christ’s virgin birth and 
vicarious death and visible return of Christ. Martin Luther King 
was an unbeliever! He was a phony preacher and phony Christian!

What would be the reaction if a national holiday were suggested 
to honor a man, even a good man, who had past ties with the Klan 
or Nazis? Would it not be expected that everyone would demand 
that he answer some questions and his life be looked at very 
closely? Why is King an exception? And why are conservatives 
playing this game of whitewashing King’s reputation? Obviously, 
truth is unimportant.

To sum up: There is no argument. As usual, I’ll be accused of 
racism but it’s only the facts. King was a pinko, a philander, a 
pervert, a prevaricator, a plagiarist and a phony. That doesn’t 
bother most people but it does bother honest people.

http://gbctroyny.com/mlk.html
                