Re: Current top myths about Usenet

[email protected] (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups alt.fan.usenet,alt.culture.usenet,news.groups
Organization Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Paul W. Schleck <[email protected]> wrote:
>"The best thing I can offer is this:
>
>   http://panix.com/v-colo/plans.html
>
>I run my news server with a full-ish, non-binary feed on a V-C 2 package
>from Panix.  That's a 6GB RAM system, 10-20GB of disk space, and the
>network isn't an issue at all; and I use the machine for other purposes
>too (email, personal login, etc).  This would obviously need to be more
>robust if the server was used by lots and lots of people, but I don't
>feel like co-location would be a significant problem nowadays.

Why would they do this when Panix already provides a news server which
is very well-run?  I cannot say enough good things about Panix's news
service or about Panix in general for that matter.
--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.