Trying to define Usenet by what it isn't (or should not be)
[email protected] (Paul W. Schleck)
| Newsgroups | news.groups,alt.fan.usenet,alt.culture.usenet |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It seems that some people prefer to define Usenet by what it isn't (or at least what they feel it should not be), rather than what it should be. They also seem to lack self-awareness about this, resulting in a low-quality information product akin to a written "Fight Club." https://www.reddit.com/r/ClassicUsenet/comments/1elh0fb/trying_to_define_usenet_by_what_it_isnt_or_should/