Re: Why can't we just "reset" Usenet?

Stone Fox <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.culture.usenet
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2025-02-25, Paul W. Schleck <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Usenet, having been around for several decades now has gotten to the
> point where you can't just host your own server. While I get the reason
> behind that, why is not a good idea, to perhaps split away from the
> current dataset and start a new feed of Usenet servers without the older
> data and without binaries? The current Usenet would still be present,
> but it would allow for people not only to go back to self-hosting
> Usenet, but would also get rid of some of the 'junk' that people don't
> want. And removing binaries from the new one, doesn't stop people from
> using the old Usenet to continue doing so.
>
> Why would this be a bad idea?" - quilnux
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/ClassicUsenet/comments/1it5bf5/why_cant_we_just_reset_usenet/
>

I like the idea of getting a few system administrators together to host
an alternative news network, like some already do with pubnix servers.

There are a few huge servers in IRC world due to network effect, and yet
there are many small IRC servers that have an active community. Usenet
could be the same.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.