Re: Why can't we just "reset" Usenet?
Stone Fox <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.culture.usenet |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-02-25, Paul W. Schleck <[email protected]> wrote: > "Usenet, having been around for several decades now has gotten to the > point where you can't just host your own server. While I get the reason > behind that, why is not a good idea, to perhaps split away from the > current dataset and start a new feed of Usenet servers without the older > data and without binaries? The current Usenet would still be present, > but it would allow for people not only to go back to self-hosting > Usenet, but would also get rid of some of the 'junk' that people don't > want. And removing binaries from the new one, doesn't stop people from > using the old Usenet to continue doing so. > > Why would this be a bad idea?" - quilnux > > https://www.reddit.com/r/ClassicUsenet/comments/1it5bf5/why_cant_we_just_reset_usenet/ > I like the idea of getting a few system administrators together to host an alternative news network, like some already do with pubnix servers. There are a few huge servers in IRC world due to network effect, and yet there are many small IRC servers that have an active community. Usenet could be the same.