Re: Jill and Joe Biden now optimally sexually compatible
David Dalton <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:51:02 -0230
| Newsgroups | alt.current-events.usa, alt.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip, misc.immigration.usa, alt.answers.human-sexuality, alt.sex |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eternal September |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote (in article<[email protected]>): > On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote > (in article<[email protected]>): > > > Here is an excerpt from my > > “International Women’s Day attempt” thread > > on alt.religion.druid, that might be of interest: > > > > But note that time has advanced such that Joe and Jill Biden > > no longer have had at least one temporary breakup of more > > than a week in the last five years, so in A-HDBE Joe went > > from straight-type-1-M to straight-type-2-M and is now > > optimally compatible with bif (woman attracted to both > > genders) Jill, and they have not been broken up. Thus my > > matches of a few years ago of Joe to Bette Midler and > > Jill to Ron Howard are no longer valid. And the optimal > > sexual compatibility should contribute to their physical > > and mental health. Yes, b’y, then. :-) > > > > However, they won’t be locked for life until they next have sex. > > I jumped the gun last night, but the above should now > be true, as of 8:34 p.m. EST March 8, 2024, the > fifth anniversary of the start of my first accurate > matchmaking period (and International Women’s Day). > > They can test optimal sexual compatibility by > electric, warming, compatible touch, increased > attraction, and increased orgasm intensity. > > Why would they have been broken up? As a country > leader, Joe Biden is an assisted shaktipat recipient (a.s.r.). > And a.s.r. will lose partial sexual compatibility, so > relationships involving at least one a.s.r. that are > not optimally sexually compatible to start with or > made so by (A,F)-HDBE will be broken up. So it is > not that the relationship has been abusive. > > On the other hand, Donald and Melania Trump (neither > of whom is an a.s.r.) have been separated across > species boundaries in the species split, so their > relationship must have been abusive. A good match > for Melania is Chris Isaak, and a good match for > Donald is Sarah Palin. I am trying again in the thread “St.Patrick’s Week attempt” on alt.religion.druid, and the above should now be true. -- David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill; And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)