Re: Re: Any one into Meshtastic & Reticulum?

Stefan Claas wrote:
> ReK2 Hispagatos wrote:
> > > [in reply to ReK2 Hispagatos <rek2@usenet_reborn.tui>]
> > 
> > > On 5/25/2025 5:31 PM, ReK2 Hispagatos wrote:
> > > > Just wondering, I found about this mesh technologies around 2-3 weeks a go
> > > > and is super fun.
> > > > https://meshtastic.org/
> > > > https://reticulum.network/index.html
> > > 
> > > I looked into it before but this all looked very unspecific and didn't 
> > > give a proper use case so far.
> > 
> > Well what better use case than to create networks not dependent of corporate
> > ISP's ? any privacy friendly service over the internet still needs and ISP,
> > ISP's can block at any time your service for political dissagreements or not
> > paying etc I think among the many use cases this 2 a a big deal to put energy
> > into, WIFI is an option but is more expensive, and is not long rage like LoRa. 
> > 
> > Reticulum in particular is way more useful than meshtastic since you can share 
> > voice/pictures and have small plain sites. Meshtastis is only focuses on 
> > msgs/chat 
> 
> LoRa and reticulum look quite superb, thanks for posting this.
> 
> What would be a good starter rig for Linux and the required hardware and would
> it be possible to get in contact with you for example, with such a rig?

Needs a lot of research to be done, I guess, for purchasing the right hardware
at Alibaba or Amazon. And the range seems to be limited to local communities.

For now I will stick with my own free of charge, secure and anonymous,
globally decentralized email infrastructure: https://tilde.club/~pollux/

:-)

Regards
Stefan