Re: Duress PIN, Mixfit and PlugMate
Ch1ffr3punk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.cypherpunks,alt.privacy.anon-server,sci.crypt |
|---|---|
| Organization | Victor Usenet Postings |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yamn3 Remailer wrote: > Ch1ffr3punk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nomen Nescio wrote: > > > > Nomen Nescio wrote: > > > > > > isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress > > > > > > PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix... > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit > > > > > > https://plugos.net/plugmate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and > > > > > OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox, > > > > > > Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container. > > > > > > > like we have with PlugMate, which can also be used with Windows or macOS > > > > and does not require a hobby student OS like Linux with it's many bugs. > > > > > > A hobby student OS like Linux? OMG! You're as stupid as can be, in > > > each and every respect on the wong side of history and technology. > > > > > > > > > > > Privacy in modern times cost money, > > > > > > Claas, you're just a criminal trying to fleece uninformed people. > > > > > > > which mature adults can afford and > > > > no UX nightmare OmniMix and it originates from Eurasia for security > > > > reasons, which non-professional westerns hate. > > > > > > OM is nothing short of the proverbial quality of German workmanship. Its > > > perfection is the only reason why you struggle with it from day one. But > > > no matter how hard you try your hacks will never reach that level. > > > > > > > It is funny how LEA people like you try to defend old shit like OmniMix. > > > > Sure you have a mission and that is to falsify facts so that people > > believing you guys can be caught. Your methods in anonymity circles > > are known to professionals. > > Mixmaster, yamn and tor are distributed networks run by volunteers not > interested in making any money, and their flawless methods of > anonymizing messages are well-known and analyzed multiple times by > experts. There's no need for a profit-driven company in this sector. > What experts? You should run a Mixmaster or YAMN remailer by yourself and learn about the deficiencies Type II technolgy with smtp(s) usage has, when not properly used with the Nym Mixnet... -- https://oc2mx.net