Re: Duress PIN, Mixfit and PlugMate

Anonymous <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.cypherpunks,alt.privacy.anon-server,sci.crypt
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Claas wrote:
>Anonymous wrote:
>> Claas spreads FUD:

>> > Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot it
>> immediately.
>> 
>> Any proof?  I don't think so.  That's just another FUD attack.

Why don't you answer that key question?

Let me guess.  VeraCrypt hidden volumes are indetectable and secure and
you presented us just one more lie.

>> 
>> > 
>> > The moment you plug your drive into an untrusted computer at the border and enter your hidden container password, that foreign machine decrypts the data directly into its RAM.
>> 
>> Who would do that?  Only you, Claas, come to my mind.

>> 
>
>What you fail to understand, VeraCrypt usage, like you propose with
>a hidden container, can easily been spotted by Border Control, so
>that you have to reveal your password.

It's you who has absolutely no idea.  When they ask for my VeraCrypt key
I'd offer them the password for the host volume and not the hidden one.
But Claas, YMMV.  ;-)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.