Re: yo charlie ya dumass
"Orsen Wells w/Citizen Cain" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | misc.transport.trucking,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.pedophile.richard-bullis,alt.idiot.richard-the-stupid,alt.dimwit.richard-bullis |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:22:12 -0800 (PST), A Teamster > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Jan 7, 9:13 pm, richard <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:46:14 -0600, Roughrider50 >>> >>> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:42:22 -0500, richard <[email protected]> >>> >wrote: >>> >>> >>Dear mister "A Teamster" >>> >>> >>The laws of the united states clearly state that nudity is legal even >>> >>when images are those of minors. >>> >>> >>Case in point. >>> >>"Dirty Pictures" was a movie about the law case involving the >>> >>Cincinnati Arts Consortium in which they displayed the works of Mr. >>> >>Maplethorpe. In which one of the pictures was that of a very young >>> >>boy naked and clearly exposing the privates. >>> >>> >Hmmmm.....referencing that sick POS Mapplethorpe doesn't do much for >>> >your case. >>> >>> I agree that some of the works he did was not all that "artful". >>> But the case itself proved that such works were NOT illegal. >>> >> >>Just answer me this.....I have asked a couple times....what the hell >>do you get out of having pictures of naked kids, if you must use that >>term? >> >>Just a simple answer. > > I get the same kick as any "normal sane" male gets from seeing a > playboy centerfold. > Bullis you do realize that you just admitted to being a pedophile, right?