Re: yo charlie ya dumass

"richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Dear mister "A Teamster"
>
> The laws of the united states clearly state that nudity is legal even
> when images are those of minors.


Hey! When did it become 1998 again? Oh, and it's pretty pathetic when you 
start off with a spelling error in the subject line, Bullis.



>
> Case in point.


Here we go. Bullis the pedophilia expert.



> "Dirty Pictures" was a movie about the law case involving the
> Cincinnati Arts Consortium in which they displayed the works of Mr.
> Maplethorpe.  In which one of the pictures was that of a very young
> boy naked and clearly exposing the privates.


So you've got a new desktop screen saver. Big deal.



>
> Judge Albanese erred when he instructed the jury that, "If one photo
> is deemed pornographic, they all are.".


Cite? Source? Case? Oh and it's a MOVIE, "ya dumass."



> 3 Cincinnati police officers illegally removed ALL of the photos.i
>


Footnote? Case number? Smoke signals? Anything????!?!??


> The jury sided in favor of the museum.
>
> On the day of the bust, the mother of the child just happened to be
> there and she was going to be arrested as well except that she had the
> signed consent form with her.



The hell? That doesn't even make any sense.



>
> Also in Cincinnati, 3 people were charged with illegally receiving
> child pornography through the mail. 2 of the 3 plead not guilty and
> were vindicated because the USPS thought they could get away with it.


So...they were found not guilty...because the Postal Service thought they 
were not guilty? Either you can't write worth a damn and have piss-poor 
grammer (true), or you're being st00pid again (or both).



> The 3rd? He was a teacher of junior high kids. They found him in the
> woods near his home with a gun shot in his head. He had committed
> suicide. While he had done nothing illegal.



Except suicide.



Shame you can't follow his example


>
> In the movie "To Sir With Love", one student asks, "Why is it that
> they can't show naked people on tv but can show African Indians
> totally naked?" Not verbatim.
> "Because that is the way they live."



Five little letters, "M," "O," "V," "I" and "E," Bullis.



>
> "The National Geographic" magazine has come under fire for daring to
> show naked people. Not just children. Each time their taken to court,
> the courts have sided with the magazine.


I bet you can name dates and editions of the nudes




>
> 12 year old Brooke Shields posed fully naked in the movie "Pretty
> Baby".  Ine the movie "Blue Lagoon", the two kids are seen naked a
> couple of times.


Yes they are, and how many times have you rewound to those scenes?


> Many other movies show children naked and it is all perfectly legal.
>

We're not talking about Polyanna or Everybody's All American, st00pid.



> There have been numerous books showing off children naked as
> educational material. Perfectly legal.


Really?  I would like to know which books show "children naked as 
educational material." Zeig Mal? That book's controversial and in some cases 
illegal to possess, Bullis.



>
> You claim I am a pedophile.


With a post like this one, i don't think there is much of a claim to it. 
You've always had a bad case of Foot-In-Mouth disease.




>Simply because I speak my mind openly on
> this topic. One just one occasion you saw that I had listed on my chat
> rooms an incest group. Where and when did I post to that group? Maybe
> I did it just to irritate you.
>


Maybe you did it because you're st00pid.


> Prove your case. Take me to court.
>

You are so fucking stupid. It's not HIS job to take you to court, nimrod 
pedo.
>