Re: Attorneys try to stop DeSantis appointees from giving depositions in Disney lawsuit
[email protected] (Danart)
| Newsgroups | alt.disney |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Forcing gay acceptance wrote: > ORLANDO, Fla. (AP)  Attorneys for the Walt Disney World governing > district taken over last year by Gov. Ron DeSantis' allies don't want the > governor's appointees answering questions under oath as part of its state > lawsuit against Disney. > > District attorneys on Monday filed a motion for a protective order that > would stop the DeSantis-appointed board members of the Central Florida > Tourism Oversight District from having to give videotaped depositions to > Disney attorneys. > > Disney and the DeSantis appointees are fighting in state court over who > controls the governing district for Disney World. The district had been > controlled by Disney supporters before last year's takeover  which was > sparked by the company's opposition to Florida's so-called ÂDon't Say Gay > law. It provides municipal services such as firefighting, planning and > mosquito control, among other things, and was controlled by Disney > supporters for most of its five decades. > > District attorneys cite the Âapex doctrine, which generally provides that > high-level government officers shouldn't be subject to depositions unless > opposing parties have exhausted all other means of obtaining information. > The doctrine is used in just a handful of U.S. states, including Florida. > > ÂDisney cannot demonstrate that the individual board members have unique, > personal knowledge that would be relevant to any of the claims, > counterclaims or defenses in this action to overcome the apex doctrine, > district attorneys said in their motion. ÂDisney's assault-style effort to > depose all the board members is simply an improper form of harassment of > these high-level government officials. > > The motion includes statements from the board members who claim that being > forced to give depositions would Âimpede their ability to fulfill their > duties and divert resources and attention away from overseeing the > district. > > Earlier this month, Disney gave notice of its intention to question under > oath six current and past DeSantis-appointed board members for the purpose > of Âdiscovery, or the process of gathering information for the case. The > entertainment giant has said previously that the district has stymied its > efforts to get documents and other information, and Disney filed a public > records lawsuit against the district earlier this year, claiming the > district's response to its requests were Âunreasonably delayed and > Âwoefully inadequate. > > Since the takeover last year, the district has faced an exodus of > experienced staffers, with many in exit surveys complaining that the > governing body has been politicized since the changeover. Just this month, > the district's administrator left to become a county elections supervisor > at half the $400,000 salary he was earning at the district, and the > district's DeSantis-appointed board chairman departed the following week. > > A fight between DeSantis and Disney began in 2022 after the company, > facing significant internal and external pressure, publicly opposed a > state law that critics have called ÂDonÂt Say Gay. The 2022 law bans > classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity in early > grades and was championed by DeSantis, who used Disney as a punching bag > in speeches until he suspended his presidential campaign this year. > > As punishment, DeSantis took over the district through legislation passed > by the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature and appointed a new board > of supervisors. > > Disney sued DeSantis and his appointees, claiming the companyÂs free > speech rights were violated for speaking out against the legislation. A > federal judge dismissed that lawsuit in January. Disney has appealed. > > Before control of the district changed hands from Disney allies to > DeSantis appointees early last year, the Disney supporters on its board > signed agreements with Disney shifting control over design and > construction at Disney World to the company. The new DeSantis appointees > claimed the Âeleventh-hour deals neutered their powers, and the district > sued the company in state court in Orlando to have the contracts voided. > > Disney has filed counterclaims that include asking the state court to > declare the agreements valid and enforceable. > > https://www.yahoo.com/news/attorneys-try-stop-desantis-appointees- > 143001153.html LGBT exist as a means of population control. That is why producers are throwing money at Disney to confuse people. They want more LGBT because it is easier then creating a "One child per house-hold" rule as with 1980's China and it's "Order". You tell Americans to be reduced to one-child per-household they would go nuts and start making babies like crazy. You can not say that to US citizen. So we have a man of African-decent ( like Obama ) literally say "If somebody calls you gay, then you might be one". But again that is a double meaning. True meaning means happy. False meaning means LGBT. It is a pun meant for two types of people. LGBT = Robots = Gentiles ( anybody non Jewish ) = Not even considered human beings or lesser to animals = Meta (#$@$## that does not matter ) = Facebook = profile ( police-profile like animal/machine/object/zoology ). Keep in mind that Disney's CEO's Michael Eisner and Bob Iger are both from Jewish families. ( Not sure which sect or grouping ). But they have had high association from birth. The idea of a labor force that is expendable, and will not populate to leave room and growth in favor of Jews. Guess what? Republicans = Jews = Remove resources and make it difficult for people to function after telling women to get divorces and raise their kids to drop-dead in the military Democrats = Chinese = To burn money on LGBT, and Vajayjay harassment centers to hire Woman's History majors, and other people with fake jobs, and lock them into submissive roles. In hopes of collapsing the economy. ....... If parents could actually be cheerleaders instead of giving into their vices and "our people" would zip up there pants and read books. Then the idea of a "Red Blooded Pro Christian United States" would thrive. We need to get rid of God from the Pledge of Allegiance, and the dollars or anything else printed by the government. This was instated via WWII. Even the Allied powers agreed the idea of the destruction of the Jews was acceptable, as they did absolutely nothing just to prevent Hitler ( the Supreme leader ) from being seen as a Martyr. They let Germany cave into poverty burning marks for heat. Why? Because Germany was the first nation to print the Bible in all it's glory via Martin Luther. To end the corruption of the Catholic Church and give some kind of Window to gods people if not the world. ...... For years great artists like Ralph Bakshi have been trying to show us the truth about the insanity of Disney. ..... In terms of being for the LGBT ( as mentioned before ). If we just ignore them, and think about the real humans. The Christians that we all was raised to be. The boys who wants and should be boys. The men who need to function as men. These LGBT would all vanish over time. However it is not granted that we respect those who gives us opportunities, despite there abuse or use of us, even if our employers are LGBT, and our bosses are LGBT. Or one of our girlfriends/wives ( vice versa ) are/were LGBTing around. We should respect the fact that these people are humans and be given the same respect we want as people. ...... So why you work as a slave for somebodies machine. They ( Whichever sect ) will continue to thrive off you. Fiction ( which I partly majored in ) is literally ways to steal money from you. Money for childish happiness, if not the time to figure out things work and to live functionally. Disney sells pacifiers in exchange to brainwash your children into a false state of mind. Next thing you know your daughter is with an ex-convict making babies unmarried, meanwhile her brain is thinking "Highschool Musical" who are living the life being musicians, singers, and dancers meanwhile they are working odd-jobs which could be replaced by robots. Like a drug dispensary. This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=662684585#662684585