Re: for the abstract

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:25:14 -0000, He Who Sees All  
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> now try to keep up there's a good chap; you're always sooo slow haha

> Brian, you despise this guy, or at least that's what you would have
> the limited audience here believe.  Time and again you rail against
> him.  Utter derision.

### - smile, we've had our clashes over the years but you're wrong if you  
think i despise anyone, and have, from an outsider's pov, actually enjoyed  
our encounters in various ways coz he's fairly smart albeit somewhat  
erratic, and even if we don't always agree which was fairly often...

plus you've asked/puzzled-over exactly this same question re lowrider too,  
about how i could possibly talk to him considering his shitty behaviour,  
and i told you then that am able to speak to him in exactly the same way  
am still able to speak to 'you', whose behaviour has been as equally  
shitty if not worse!

so go figure :)








> What you are now showing is the insincerity of your worldview.  Which
> says a lot about your character, or lack thereof.
> You'll bluster and babble about this thinking that enough verbiage
> thrown at it will somehow disguise the reality of your changing, ever
> changing, position.  A real person with a serious grievance does not
> just change views like that.

### - lol, and yet only the other day you lectured me re keeping this  
place going, saying: don't i think it's possible for people (meaning you)  
to change their minds occasionally??

lol riiiiight...  :)




> The only possible conclusion is that
> your views and reactions to life, to reality, are frivilous. Immature.
> And it's far too late for you to grow up. A shame to waste a life like
> that.

### - (really laffing) well that's hardly the only 'possible' conclusion  
is it heh...

no, that's just your overly hasty + sloppy conclusion clearly based on  
faulty reasoning and a very nasty disposition haha, something of a  
repeating pattern of yours, one that's become rather predictable to say  
the least...

iow: predictably slow: tap him on the shoulder on tuesday and on wednesday  
afternoon he turns round and says: huh? wot??

and because 'intelligence' is rather difficult to define, there being all  
kinds of tests to measure it and stuff but defining it remains  
controversial...

imho though, intelligence is just how rapidly or not one's brain  
communicates with other parts of itself, how fast it sparks across from  
one side to the other & back... a measure of electrical resistance perhaps  
heh: the less resistance the faster the flow of current through the entire  
system + the faster it coordinates & correlates information overall...

a moron, in that sense, being ponderous and slow witted; slow to realise  
the implications of any given argument if in fact he gets them at all...  
on the other end of that scale: people who're so fast they can almost take  
the words out of your mouth before you even speak them they're operating  
at such a rapid pace of information processing, consequently they're  
always several steps ahead all the time...

intelligence not being 'how much' a person knows, so much as 'how fast'  
they operate at ;)