Re: for the abstract

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:32:45 -0000, slider <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 07:25:14 -0000, He Who Sees All  
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> now try to keep up there's a good chap; you're always sooo slow haha
>
>> Brian, you despise this guy, or at least that's what you would have
>> the limited audience here believe.  Time and again you rail against
>> him.  Utter derision.
>
>### - smile, we've had our clashes over the years but you're wrong if you  
>think i despise anyone, and have, from an outsider's pov, actually enjoyed  
>our encounters in various ways coz he's fairly smart albeit somewhat  
>erratic, and even if we don't always agree which was fairly often...
>
>plus you've asked/puzzled-over exactly this same question re lowrider too,  
>about how i could possibly talk to him considering his shitty behaviour,  
>and i told you then that am able to speak to him in exactly the same way  
>am still able to speak to 'you', whose behaviour has been as equally  
>shitty if not worse!
>
>so go figure :)

I'm just a serious person which comes with the territory for some, as
they age.  No point in retaining any semblance of youth when youth has
entirely disappeared.  It's just being realistic, icy cold eyeballs on
the world (or in my case, faded blue rheumy eyeballs peering through
the cataracts :)




>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> What you are now showing is the insincerity of your worldview.  Which
>> says a lot about your character, or lack thereof.
>> You'll bluster and babble about this thinking that enough verbiage
>> thrown at it will somehow disguise the reality of your changing, ever
>> changing, position.  A real person with a serious grievance does not
>> just change views like that.
>
>### - lol, and yet only the other day you lectured me re keeping this  
>place going, saying: don't i think it's possible for people (meaning you)  
>to change their minds occasionally??
>
>lol riiiiight...  :)

No that was a a long time ago, several years ago.  We made a deal,
after Jeremy (Dave) spat out the dummy and fucked off, never to
return.  You and I would keep the pulse here just above permadeath.
Well, we did actually, quite an achievement :)


>
>
>
>
>> The only possible conclusion is that
>> your views and reactions to life, to reality, are frivilous. Immature.
>> And it's far too late for you to grow up. A shame to waste a life like
>> that.
>
>### - (really laffing) well that's hardly the only 'possible' conclusion  
>is it heh...

Nope, I was wrong.  In this universe, it may have been, but in the
multiverse, every variation, infinitely repeated, with all infinite
variations of each repeat, will play out over eternity.

So, yep, I was wrong and a little premature.

>
>no, that's just your overly hasty + sloppy conclusion clearly based on  
>faulty reasoning and a very nasty disposition haha, something of a  
>repeating pattern of yours, one that's become rather predictable to say  
>the least...

Well I didn't say I was reasoning. It was a pretty quick knee jerk
reaction to what you posted.  Not much, if any, reason involved,
whicih is a rarity for me, being Mr Reason itself, personified lol.

However, you cannot say that a person who does not exercise reason is
also predictable.  Quite the opposite.  Think about it.

>
>iow: predictably slow: tap him on the shoulder on tuesday and on wednesday  
>afternoon he turns round and says: huh? wot??

Being personal now.  How unbecoming.

>
>and because 'intelligence' is rather difficult to define, there being all  
>kinds of tests to measure it and stuff but defining it remains  
>controversial...
>
>imho though, intelligence is just how rapidly or not one's brain  
>communicates with other parts of itself, how fast it sparks across from  
>one side to the other & back... a measure of electrical resistance perhaps  
>heh: the less resistance the faster the flow of current through the entire  
>system + the faster it coordinates & correlates information overall...
>
>a moron, in that sense, being ponderous and slow witted; slow to realise  
>the implications of any given argument if in fact he gets them at all...  
>on the other end of that scale: people who're so fast they can almost take  
>the words out of your mouth before you even speak them they're operating  
>at such a rapid pace of information processing, consequently they're  
>always several steps ahead all the time...
>
>intelligence not being 'how much' a person knows, so much as 'how fast'  
>they operate at ;)


You can be very garrulous sometimes mate.  Take it easy.  Relax.  Get
a dog.  They are great.  I can attest to that, we have a new puppy for
the first time in over 10 years (have had many dogs in life, and many
cats too).  He is an American Staffy, only 3 months old.  Makes me
young again :)

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com