Re: US deploys additional force to protect Israel from Iran retaliation

On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 00:45:14 +0100, slider <[email protected]>
wrote:

>The US is sending additional warships and fighter jets to the Middle East  
>as Washington seeks to boost its defences ahead of a possible Iranian  
>attack against Israel by Iran and its proxy forces, the Pentagon said  
>Friday.

Not possible.  Certain.  Just a matter of time.  To not attack Israel,
Iran will externally lose face and become internally unstable.  The
Jews of course have already calculated this - Netanyahu will sacrifice
millions, his own race if necessary, in order to personally survive.
He is extremely dangerous - a sociopathic Zionist nationalist
terrorist Jew.

Bibi wants a full frontal confrontation with the eternal enemy.  Iran
may already have the atomic/nuclear/thermonuclear bomb but they
certainly have hundreds of thousands of conventional missiles armed
more than likely with bacterial and chemical warheads as well as
conventional.

Bad times coming...

>
>The Pentagon detailed the reinforced presence after US President Joe Biden  
>informed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about Washington’s  
>plans to help protect Israel in the event of an attack. The Biden  
>administration also continued to urge a de-escalation of regional tensions  
>and a ceasefire in Gaza.
>
>https://www.ft.com/content/d6fd43b9-5e88-4de9-b000-16dcd2fbcf59
>
>Lloyd Austin, US defence secretary, “has ordered adjustments to US  
>military posture designed to improve US force protection, to increase  
>support for the defence of Israel, and to ensure the United States is  
>prepared to respond to various contingencies”, Pentagon spokeswoman  
>Sabrina Singh said in a statement.
>
>Austin directed additional warships that can shoot down ballistic missiles  
>and fighter jets to the region as well as to Europe, she said.
>
>The US already has other assets in the region, such as the USS Wasp  
>amphibious assault ship that can help with quick responses and possible  
>evacuations.
>
>The stepped-up US posture comes amid growing concerns that Iran and other  
>allied militant groups are set to retaliate for the killings this week of  
>Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and Fuad Shukr, a senior  
>military commander from Lebanon-based Hizbollah.
>
>The White House said Biden and Netanyahu spoke about “efforts to support  
>Israel’s defence against threats, including against ballistic missiles and  
>drones,” which also included “new defensive US military deployments”.
>
>Austin also spoke Friday with Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant about  
>the threats from Iran and the additional steps the US was taking to  
>support Israel. “Secretary Austin highlighted that further escalation is  
>not inevitable,” Singh said.
>
>### - urgent chatter currently flyin' about re it's all just about to  
>kick-off depending on what iran actually does next, possibly on sunday,  
>any stronger response than last time (300 rockets) potentially spelling an  
>immediate retaliation en-mass by western forces in an effort to take iran  
>down permanently, and thus maybe others too while they're at it!

No one is taking Iran down permanently, it's a huge country with
mountains and ice and deserts impossible to subdue.  And it's allied
with Russia which has as you know a nuclear arsenal second to none,
inherited from Soviet times.  The US will defend Israel but will not
directly attack Iran.

>
>it's all currently up in the air and could go either way, but there's one  
>thing for sure: if it all goes 'that' way it wont be the end of it, it'll  
>only be the beginning of it!
>
>and we'll see some fireworks then huh...

The human condition is "fireworks".  A carryover from our tribal days
back in the swamplands when our forebears lived in caves and feared
the smilodons...

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com