Re: Betrayel

slider wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:02:51 +0100, someone <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Whether all people who have what is called schizophrenia
>> or some people would be able to have more lucid dreams
>> and contribute to a culture sounds like a fine topic.
> 
> ### - i think so too... but that's only one example because the overall 
> premise included 'other' kinds of mental illness too as thus 
> 'potentially' being closer to an altered state on a daily basis compared 
> to the average man in the street, that being my whole point from the 
> start but which you were refusing to even hear without continually 
> changing the subject, there being nada about what am suggesting that 
> warrants such evasion, and which cued my objection to you screwing 
> around for nada...
> 
> that what the OP originally said/suggested was indeed a generalisation, 
> but that doesn't detract from its content being interesting and/or 
> containing a facet of truth, and didn't deserve being slammed out of 
> hand (unnecessarily rudely i might add)
> 
> i mean, what gives you (or anyone come to that) the right to punch 
> people in the face for something they're saying or commenting on like 
> that?? especially if what they're saying/suggesting has some merit to 
> it!? (merit, you've just agreed, would be nice)
> 
> no, it was done out of something 'other' than rational debate, it was 
> done out of cruelty and spite tinged with personal hatred and in my book 
> that kind of bs is bang out of order, especially when the OP is from my 
> group and is being attacked for what is ultimately a fairly intelligent 
> comment/observation (we deal in 'all' subjects here at alt.dreams 
> castaneda, everything in this world & beyond is part of life so no 
> subject is taboo, indeed one has to cover everything that is/exists or 
> it's clearly not complete)

what a bunch of bull wangle