| Newsgroups |
alt.dreams.castaneda,alt.support.depression,alt.support.schizophrenia,alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.philosophy.taoism |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
slider wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 21:32:57 +0100, % <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> slider wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:02:51 +0100, someone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Whether all people who have what is called schizophrenia
>>>> or some people would be able to have more lucid dreams
>>>> and contribute to a culture sounds like a fine topic.
>>> ### - i think so too... but that's only one example because the
>>> overall premise included 'other' kinds of mental illness too as thus
>>> 'potentially' being closer to an altered state on a daily basis
>>> compared to the average man in the street, that being my whole point
>>> from the start but which you were refusing to even hear without
>>> continually changing the subject, there being nada about what am
>>> suggesting that warrants such evasion, and which cued my objection to
>>> you screwing around for nada...
>>> that what the OP originally said/suggested was indeed a
>>> generalisation, but that doesn't detract from its content being
>>> interesting and/or containing a facet of truth, and didn't deserve
>>> being slammed out of hand (unnecessarily rudely i might add)
>>> i mean, what gives you (or anyone come to that) the right to punch
>>> people in the face for something they're saying or commenting on like
>>> that?? especially if what they're saying/suggesting has some merit to
>>> it!? (merit, you've just agreed, would be nice)
>>> no, it was done out of something 'other' than rational debate, it
>>> was done out of cruelty and spite tinged with personal hatred and in
>>> my book that kind of bs is bang out of order, especially when the OP
>>> is from my group and is being attacked for what is ultimately a
>>> fairly intelligent comment/observation (we deal in 'all' subjects
>>> here at alt.dreams castaneda, everything in this world & beyond is
>>> part of life so no subject is taboo, indeed one has to cover
>>> everything that is/exists or it's clearly not complete)
>>
>> what a bunch of bull wangle
>
> ### - i see... so you're one of those hating/spiteful trolls too that
> haunts these groups eh?
>
> gotcha, no problem, this world is filled to the brim with fools and
> unthinking morons so why should you be any different huh...
>
> at least the OP's idea/suggestion wasn't 'totally' swept under the rug
> by narcissistic bullies pursuing only their own petty agendas instead of
> finding summat of value or worthwhile to contribute to this dying world,
> coz it IS dying ya know, and will take us with it when it goes!
>
> but 'you' don't have to worry about things like that huh, you've gots
> your own selfish crap to pursue whether it harms the planet or not, what
> do you care as long as you're alright jack??
>
> (smile, it never takes long to expose the liars and fakes does it, they
> always reveal themselves because their ego always has to come first hah!)
>
> owwwch! :)
i'll answer the first question i didn't read the rest ,
it says what they all say so in answer to your question ,
yes i am