Re: Pics from Kamala rally 10/29
Joel <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:41:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.computer.workshop,alt.drugs.psychedelics |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
pothead <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2024-10-31, Joel <[email protected]> wrote: >> pothead <[email protected]> wrote: >>>On 2024-10-30, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>> [email protected] says... >>>>> >>>>> https://imgur.com/a/oct-29-2024-kamala-harris-rally-dc-souvenir-DDadSnY >>>> >>>> There goes my breakfast. >>> >>>If Kamala can't attract a large crowd in ultra blue DC then there is a problem. >>>Too bad Joe Biden via his "garbage comment" took the wind out of her sails. >>>ROTFLMAO! >> >> Are you crazy? It *WAS* a "large crowd". Duh. >> >That's my point. >Sure it was a large crowd. > >Try doing the same in a red area and see what happens. Ah, well, it's true that the DMV (District/Maryland/Virginia, DC metropolitan area) is pretty Blue. But the energy of this crowd was different, than you'd find at a Trump rally. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.