Re: Trump cared more about his earlobe than the guy who actually died
Joel <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:04:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.drugs.psychedelics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bobbie Sellers <[email protected]> wrote: >> If I'm to die, it'll be in the midst of an attempt to avenge this >> theft of the presidency by the Hitler-dictator. I would have no >> problem pulling the trigger. > ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki> > >Threatening the president of the United States is a federal felony under >United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It consists of knowingly and >willfully mailing or _ otherwise ? making "any threat to take the life >of, to kidnap, or to inflict great bodily harm upon the president of the >United States" > >In other words do not talk about your homicical intentions toware the >Darn Old Fart. > >You may think you are secure in Freedom of Speech but Usenet is audited >and probable pervaded by agents of the machine. > Who will care for your loved ones if you are chucked into the lockup? If given the opportunity, I would be *proud* to pull the trigger on DJT. I care not at all about saying it here, on Usenet, what are they gonna do, cancel me paying them $10 a month? Are the feds gonna make them do that? Bring it on. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.