Re: Tweet/X post: "This is the front runner for Trump's AG."
Joel <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Nov 2024 16:55:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.drugs.psychedelics,talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>The so-called expert thinks ladies can have a penis. >>>> >>>>If you're not into it, don't pursue it. I'll do what I wish, retard, >>>>and you can't stop me. >>> >>>Nobody said anything about stopping you, dufus. >> >>And yet you debate what I like, as if it's abnormal or in any respect >>your business. > >No, we don't "debate" it. It *is* abnormal. That's a fact. No debate. It's a lot more normal than your preoccupation with owning your AR-15, I looked at your Twitter profile, you're a total coward, needing guns to be tough. Pathetic. Go eat your wife's yeast-infected pussy, mine will be pleasuring my male G-spot, with her gock. >>>> You're gonna see her >>> >>>him >> >>She > >He > >>could knock you out with a slap from her stiff cock (HRT is >>overrated). :D > >No, he couldn't. You'd probably shoot her, and go to prison, congrats, that's what your obsession is going to lead you to, dummy. >>>> on TV, with me, after I replace Trump. >>> >>>Nah, this is how we'll probably see you on TV >>> >>>https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/03/NYPICHPDPICT000008891963.jpg?resize=1024,566&quality=75&strip=all >> >>I'm not clicking that right-wing tabloid link. > >I understand your abject fear. It's not that it'd infect my *Linux* computer, dipshit, or even a Winblows computer, it's that I don't consume right-wing media, period. I have more self-respect. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.