Re: PING: Ivo

Nadegda <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: 

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> 
>> Ivo Gandolfo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote:
>> 
>>>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini
>>>>*twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must
>>>>repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this
>>>>silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by
>>>>making it look like the server is down? 
>> 
>>>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's
>>>>first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it
>>>>prevents much spam.
>> 
>>>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network 
>>>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to 
>>>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something
>>>like this. 
>> 
>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his
>> paranoic tendancies.
> 
> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There
> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just
> might, be apropos here.
> 
>> There is only one correct response:
> 
> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by
> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread".

No thread you're ever in is productive.

> <snicker>
> 
> FU set appropriately.

yep.