Re: Facts are facts in religioworld.

In article <[email protected]>, 
[email protected] says...
> 
> % wrote:
> > Ted wrote:
> >> Alice/Ted wrote:
> >>> % wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maximus wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ted wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Michael Christ wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 4/04/2024 3:00 pm, Ted wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Maximus wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ted wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:10:50 GMT, "Ted"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence that any soul
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exists.  >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OMG, you're kidding,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?  WTF do you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> >> holds >> you >>>>>> up, man??
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muscle and bone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How ridiculous. When your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soul leaves your body, your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> muscle >> and >> bone >>>> collapse to the ground because
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're >> no >> longer >> being >> supported by the >>>>
> >>>> soul.  >>>>>>>>>That's obvious.  >> >> >> >> > > >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the muscle and bones are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still there but the soul
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't.  >> >> Good >> class, >>> well done.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The first time the question was asked:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are assuming there was a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "soul" there in the first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place.  What is your basis for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that assumption?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the beatles
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently you are unable to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide a rational answer so you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resort to attempted deflection and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> redirection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't claim the Beatles weren't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real. I remember seeing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >> on >> > Ed Sullivan. They were quite real. Do you
> >>>>>>> think >>Ed >>>>>>Sullivan >> was a >> > myth too?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I remember seeing them on Jack Parr,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their first American appearance, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that has nothing to do with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence or non-existence of a soul.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They even don't accomplish a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misdirection or attempted change of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject very well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They do however strongly emphasize a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete and total failure to address
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual issue as well as a failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to even attempt to answer the question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "actual issue", as I see it, is your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implication that Ed Sullivan was a myth!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The actual issue is the question I asked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above and will repeat here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The second time the question was asked:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> " You are assuming there was a "soul" there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the first place.  What is your basis for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that assumption?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, what is your basis for that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assumption?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, the Ed Sullivan Show was not the first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance by the Beatles in the US?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Teenage music fans comprised a large part
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of The Beatles? fan base. The news magazine
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show The Huntley-Brinkley Report likely
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn?t register with them. But anyone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching the show on Nov.  18, 1963, saw
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Beatles? first TV appearance in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Beatles showed up on American TV again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few weeks before their first live TV
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in the U.S. On Jan.  3.  1964,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk show host Jack Paar aired clips of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fab Four performing live versions of ?From
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Me to You? and ?She Loves You?  to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever-present audiences of screaming
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teenagers, per The Trivia Book of The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beatles."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that show on TV.  They were greeted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with hysterical laughter.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ed Sullivan was on  Feb. 9, 1964.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/the-beatles-1st-tv-appearance-in-the-u-s-wasnt-the-ed-sullivan-show.html/ 
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for straightening that out, Attila. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was just a kid then, so I don't remember.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you ignored the basic question but I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can repeat it - again - for the third time:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   " You are assuming there was a "soul" there in the first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   place.  What is your basis for that assumption?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. Your soul is what holds you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.  That's obvious.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made that assumption clear.  I am asking
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the basis you use for that assumption.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or did you just make it up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The basis is simple observation. When someone's soul
> >>>>>>>>>>>> leaves their body, they fall down. Because there's no
> >>>>>>>>>>>> longer anything holding them up. As I said, it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> obvious. So obvious that I don't understand why
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not getting it.
> >>>>>>>>>>> because it's not a legitimate proposition. the soul is
> >>>>>>>>>>> not in evidence. you have to establish first that a
> >>>>>>>>>>> soul exists before you can posit any arguments about it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If the soul doesn't exist then why are there still
> >>>>>>>>>> monkeys?
> >>>>>>>>> I doubt it minimus dickus will answer that excellent
> >>>>>>>>> question, Ted.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LOL!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> He is not about truth, he is about lifestyle.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Michael Christ
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And just as you predicted, he sidestepped the question
> >>>>>>>> instead of answering it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> no I did not liar. I requested clarification of it. and I or
> >>>>>>> anyone is under no obligation to answer your questions anyway,
> >>>>>>> liar.
> >>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What question? About the monkeys? I'd just like to know what
> >>>>>> exactly it is you have against monkeys. Makes no sense to me.
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There better not be anyone dissing monkeys. You know how I live
> >>>>> monkeys.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> 'i live monkeys'
> >>>>
> >>>> https://postimg.cc/cvSJ4pty  LOL
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can ratboy the frogging fucktard possibly think that anybody ever
> >>> clicks on his url links? LOL!  :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> you and the pissbum click on every link that's posted, alice  lol
> > 
> > you don't post any links
>  >
>  >
> liar
> 
> the one below has *your* name on it, and you wear it well -
> 
> http://tinyur1.com/peescent

More lies and broken links.