Re: Buttigieg: Building 8 EV Charging Stations Under $7.5 Billion Investment for Them Is 'On Track'
pothead <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:51:44 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.engineering.electrical |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kamala Harris Sucks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024-09-20, Ryan Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/20/2024 8:37 AM, John Smyth wrote: >> On track for what? >> China can build a coal plant in a week and we can't even build a >> charging station. >> >> Buttigieg: Building 8 EV Charging Stations Under $7.5 Billion Investment >> for Them Is ‘On Track’ >> >> >> <https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/09/20/buttigieg-building-8-ev-charging-stations-under-7-5-billion-investment-for-them-is-on-track/> >> >> 'On Thursday’s broadcast of CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Transportation >> Secretary Pete Buttigieg stated that building eight electric vehicle >> charging stations so far under the Inflation Reduction Act’s $7.5 >> billion investment in electric vehicle charging stations is “on track.” >> Because most construction will occur in the second half of the decade. >> >> Co-host Joe Kernen asked, “[O]ur designs on electrification of the auto >> industry, have we recalibrated there? And I’ll just give you one item >> and you can — maybe you can explain why, but under the Inflation >> Reduction Act, 7.5 billion for building these charging stations. The >> latest information, eight have been built with the 7.5 billion that had >> been allocated. You’re supposed to get to 500,000 of these charging >> stations by 2030. What is really the problem with — do you — have you >> looked at that and figured out why?” >> >> Buttigieg responded, “Oh yeah, that’s on track. So, we’re at about >> 190,000 publicly available charging stations in the U.S. That’s >> approximately double what the level was when President Biden came in. >> The issue, though, is that there are some gaps in the market, ones that >> are just not going to be built by the private sector that’s been >> building the construction of those chargers to date. That’s why the >> legislation provided for funding to do federally-supported chargers that >> are intended to be online before 2030. Now, the bulk of that >> construction will happen in ’27, ’28, quite a bit, actually, I expect by >> 2026. A handful, as you mentioned, are actually already up and running. >> But really what you’re going to see is more in the second half of this >> decade. And it’s really important to have those federally-supported >> chargers, because you have stretches of road or even just in the middle >> of our cities, apartment buildings, places in our economy where it just >> doesn’t yet pencil out for there to be the private sector profitably >> doing that. And even though about 80% of EV charging happens at home, >> the reality is that the new EV kind of landscape we’re working toward >> where the president’s goal is about half of sales to be EVs by the end >> of this decade requires us, by the end of this decade, to have a lot of >> charging apparatus that just isn’t there as we’re sitting here in >> 2024.”' > > Buttfag is just as dumb as any other Biden (Obama) DEI hire. That > stupid fool has been caught numerous times embellishing his wikipedia > page and lying about it. > > The BEVs won't be there either. Market for them is going to shit > because they are worthless in remote areas and require too much time to > recharge. > > Wait until the Democrats little black pets decide BEV owners are easy > prey and target the charging stations. > Yea. For a guy with impressive education credentials he sure doesn't seem to be able to perform the job he was appointed to. -- pothead Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing